Agabiti-Rosei E, Muiesan M L
Cattedra Semeiotica e Metodologia Medica, Universitá di Brescia, Italy.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Jan;16(1):S53-8.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independent from blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors. Available data indicate that patients who fail to achieve a reduction in LVH are much more likely to suffer cardiovascular events than those in whom LVH is reduced or even normalized using antihypertensive treatment. Reversal of LVH, therefore, represents a major goal in the treatment of hypertensive patients. REGRESSION OF LVH: Since obesity and dietary sodium intake may modulate the degree of LVH, non-pharmacological intervention has achieved a successful reduction in left ventricular mass (LVM). LVM is more closely related to 24-h blood pressure values than to clinical blood pressure values. Recent evidence from the Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation has shown that the regression of cardiac hypertrophy is predicted to a greater degree by the effect of antihypertensive treatment on 24-h average blood pressure than by that on clinic or home blood pressure. The increase in blood pressure variability may also be an independent determinant of cardiovascular target-organ damage, particularly of cardiac hypertrophy. However, the effects of antihypertensive drugs on blood pressure variability can be difficult to determine, mainly because a correct measurement of variability requires a beat-to-beat measurement of ambulatory blood pressure; several measures have been proposed to evaluate the smoothness of blood pressure control during antihypertensive treatment. Other important determinants of LVH reduction are represented by baseline values of LVM, extent of blood pressure reduction and duration of treatment. Furthermore, the degree of cardiac hypertrophy reduction is not the same for the different classes of antihypertensive drugs because, beyond the control of blood pressure, they may interfere differently with several non-haemodynamic stimuli, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and the adrenergic systems or other growth factors. A more pronounced reduction in LVM with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists has been demonstrated in several recent meta-analyses. The results of further multicenter on-going trials are awaited to evaluate definitely whether various antihypertensive strategies differ in their ability to reverse LVH and to adequately assess the relationship between changes in LVM and subsequent prognosis, with serial control of blood pressure values measured in the clinic and by ambulatory monitoring.
左心室肥厚(LVH)是心血管发病和死亡的有力预测指标,独立于血压及其他心血管危险因素。现有数据表明,未能使左心室肥厚减轻的患者比使用抗高血压治疗使左心室肥厚减轻甚至恢复正常的患者更易发生心血管事件。因此,逆转左心室肥厚是高血压患者治疗的主要目标。左心室肥厚的逆转:由于肥胖和饮食钠摄入可能调节左心室肥厚程度,非药物干预已成功降低左心室质量(LVM)。LVM与24小时血压值的关系比与临床血压值的关系更为密切。动态血压监测与赖诺普利评估研究的最新证据表明,抗高血压治疗对24小时平均血压的影响比其对诊室或家庭血压的影响更能预测心脏肥厚的逆转。血压变异性增加也可能是心血管靶器官损害(尤其是心脏肥厚)的独立决定因素。然而,抗高血压药物对血压变异性的影响可能难以确定,主要是因为变异性的正确测量需要动态血压的逐搏测量;已提出多种措施来评估抗高血压治疗期间血压控制的平稳性。左心室肥厚减轻的其他重要决定因素由LVM的基线值、血压降低程度和治疗持续时间表示。此外,不同类别的抗高血压药物使心脏肥厚减轻的程度不同,因为除了控制血压外,它们可能对几种非血流动力学刺激(包括肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮和肾上腺素能系统或其他生长因子)有不同干扰。最近的几项荟萃分析表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙拮抗剂能更显著地降低LVM。有待进一步多中心正在进行的试验结果来明确评估各种抗高血压策略在逆转左心室肥厚能力方面是否存在差异,并通过连续控制诊室测量和动态监测的血压值来充分评估LVM变化与后续预后之间的关系。