Salvador-Carulla L, Garcia-Mellado M J, Velazquez R, Romero C, Alonso F
Grupo de Investigacion en Medicina Psicosocial, Universidad de Cadiz, Spain.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1998 Feb;42 ( Pt 1):22-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00070.x.
The reliability of the Spanish version of the Social Behaviour Schedule (SBS) was tested in a vocational setting on a sample of 64 subjects with learning disabilities. Test-retest assessment showed a good percentage of agreement (80%) and adequate kappa values for most SBS items. The overall percentage of agreement of inter-rater reliability was 85% and kappa values were moderate to nearly perfect for 52% of items. Inter-informant analyses produced poorer results, with an average agreement of 43% and inadequate kappa values on 42% of items. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.64 for test-retest, 0.76 for inter-rater assessment and 0.94 for inter-informant assessment. The Spearman correlation coefficient was adequate on the test-retest and inter-rater analyses, but not on inter-informant analysis. This low inter-informant agreement could be attributed to environmental factors which alter the reliability of reports from different informants in community settings with high levels of normalization. In such environments, an interview with a key informant may not suffice, and both a careful review of the clinical record and a direct interview with subjects may enhance the reliability of the information attained.
在职业环境中,对64名学习障碍受试者的样本测试了西班牙语版社会行为量表(SBS)的信度。重测评估显示,大多数SBS项目的一致性百分比良好(80%)且kappa值适当。评定者间信度的总体一致性百分比为85%,52%的项目kappa值为中等至近乎完美。信息提供者间分析结果较差,平均一致性为43%,42%的项目kappa值不足。重测的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.64,评定者间评估为0.76,信息提供者间评估为0.94。斯皮尔曼相关系数在重测和评定者间分析中适当,但在信息提供者间分析中不适当。这种信息提供者间的低一致性可能归因于环境因素,这些因素会改变在高度正常化的社区环境中不同信息提供者报告的信度。在这样的环境中,仅对关键信息提供者进行访谈可能不够,仔细审查临床记录以及直接与受试者访谈可能会提高所获信息的信度。