Suppr超能文献

英格兰和威尔士早期听力筛查的成本。

The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

作者信息

Stevens J C, Hall D M, Davis A, Davies C M, Dixon S

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1998 Jan;78(1):14-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.1.14.

Abstract

A survey was carried out in 10 centres in England and Wales to determine the costs of hearing screening in the first year of life. The screens that were studied were targeted neonatal, universal neonatal, and the health visitor distraction test (HVDT) or alternative surveillance. Valid data were available from five centres for targeted neonatal screening (TNS), three for universal neonatal screening (UNS), and nine for the HVDT, although only five of the HVDT screens had valid data for follow up costs. The neonatal costs were consistent across the centres surveyed, whereas those for the HVDT screen varied considerably. The mean service costs for TNS, UNS, and the HVDT at 1994 prices were 5052 Pounds, 13,881 Pounds, and 24,519 Pounds for a standardised district of 1000 live births. Three conclusions seem justified. Firstly, UNS need not be prohibitively expensive as it costs considerably less than HVDT screening. Secondly, TNS appears to be a relatively inexpensive way of improving the age of identification of a proportion of the congenitally hearing impaired. Thirdly, given the published yields for UNS and the HVDT, the results indicate that UNS offers the most cost effective overall approach with alternative systems in place to identify late onset permanent hearing losses.

摘要

在英格兰和威尔士的10个中心开展了一项调查,以确定一岁以内听力筛查的成本。所研究的筛查项目包括针对性新生儿筛查、普遍性新生儿筛查以及健康访视员分心测试(HVDT)或替代监测。有五个中心提供了针对性新生儿筛查(TNS)的有效数据,三个中心提供了普遍性新生儿筛查(UNS)的有效数据,九个中心提供了HVDT的有效数据,不过HVDT筛查中只有五个有后续成本的有效数据。各被调查中心的新生儿筛查成本较为一致,而HVDT筛查的成本差异很大。以1994年价格计算,对于一个有1000例活产的标准化地区,TNS、UNS和HVDT的平均服务成本分别为5052英镑、13881英镑和24519英镑。似乎可以得出三个结论。其一,普遍性新生儿筛查并非贵得让人望而却步,因为其成本远低于HVDT筛查。其二,针对性新生儿筛查似乎是提高部分先天性听力受损者确诊年龄的一种相对低成本的方式。其三,鉴于已公布的普遍性新生儿筛查和HVDT筛查的筛查率,结果表明,普遍性新生儿筛查在有替代系统来识别迟发性永久性听力损失的情况下,提供了最具成本效益的总体方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Cochlear implants in the United Kingdom: awareness and utilization.英国的人工耳蜗:认知与应用
Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Mar;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S32-7. doi: 10.1179/1467010013Z.00000000077.
6
Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.新生儿听力障碍筛查。
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Nov;83(5):377-83. doi: 10.1136/adc.83.5.377.
8
Screening for congenital hearing impairment: time for a change.先天性听力障碍筛查:是时候做出改变了。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Jul;79(1):F73-6. doi: 10.1136/fn.79.1.f73.

本文引用的文献

1
Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.新生儿耳声发射筛查与耳聋的识别
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Jan;74(1):F16-25. doi: 10.1136/fn.74.1.f16.
2
What is the role of the distraction test of hearing?听力干扰试验的作用是什么?
Arch Dis Child. 1994 Jan;70(1):10-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.1.10.
8
Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods.听力损失的早期识别:筛查与监测方法
Arch Dis Child. 1990 May;65(5):479-84; discussion 484-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.5.479.
9
Hearing screening in children--state of the art(s).儿童听力筛查——最新技术水平
Arch Dis Child. 1990 Nov;65(11):1193-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.11.1193.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验