Galer B S, Bruehl S, Harden R N
Department of Neurology and Anesthesiology, Multidisciplinary Pain Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98105, USA.
Clin J Pain. 1998 Mar;14(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199803000-00007.
To assess the ability of the International Association for the Study of Pain Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) diagnostic criteria and associated features to discriminate between CRPS patients and patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Prospective assessment of signs and symptoms in a series of CRPS and diabetic neuropathy patients.
University of Washington Multidisciplinary Pain Center.
A consecutive series of 18 CRPS patients and 30 diabetic neuropathy patients.
Patients completed a 10-item patient history questionnaire assessing symptoms of CRPS prior to medical evaluation. The evaluating physician completed a 10-item patient examination questionnaire assessing objective signs of CRPS.
The analyses conducted were designed to test the ability of CRPS signs and symptoms and associated features to discriminate between CRPS patients and diabetic neuropathy patients.
Data analysis suggested that CRPS decision rules may lead to overdiagnosis of the disorder. Diagnosis based on self-reported symptoms can be diagnostically useful in some circumstances. The addition of trophic tissue changes, range of motion changes, and "burning" quality of pain did not improve diagnostic accuracy, but the addition of motor neglect signs did. Test of a CRPS scoring system resulted in improved accuracy relative to current criteria and decision rules.
Poorly understood disorders lacking prototypical signs/symptoms and diagnostic laboratory testing must rely on the development of reliable diagnostic guidelines. The results of this study should assist in the further refinement of the CRPS diagnostic criteria.
评估国际疼痛研究协会复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)诊断标准及相关特征区分CRPS患者与疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者的能力。
对一系列CRPS和糖尿病神经病变患者的体征和症状进行前瞻性评估。
华盛顿大学多学科疼痛中心。
连续纳入18例CRPS患者和30例糖尿病神经病变患者。
患者在医学评估前完成一份10项的病史问卷,评估CRPS症状。评估医师完成一份10项的患者检查问卷,评估CRPS的客观体征。
所进行的分析旨在测试CRPS体征、症状及相关特征区分CRPS患者与糖尿病神经病变患者的能力。
数据分析表明,CRPS诊断规则可能导致该疾病的过度诊断。在某些情况下,基于自我报告症状的诊断可能具有诊断价值。添加营养组织变化、活动范围变化和疼痛的“烧灼感”并未提高诊断准确性,但添加运动忽视体征则有改善。对CRPS评分系统的测试相对于当前标准和诊断规则提高了准确性。
对于缺乏典型体征/症状且诊断性实验室检查难以理解的疾病,必须依靠制定可靠的诊断指南。本研究结果应有助于进一步完善CRPS诊断标准。