Deschenes M R, Sharma J V, Brittingham K T, Casa D J, Armstrong L E, Maresh C M
Department of Kinesiology, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Feb;77(3):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s004210050329.
Previous studies investigating the impact of circadian rhythms on physiological variables during exercise have yielded conflicting results. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine maximal aerobic exercise performance, as well as the physiological and psychophysiological responses to exercise, at four different intervals (0800 hours, 1200 hours, 1600 hours, and 2000 hours) within the segment of the 24-h day in which strenuous physical activity is typically performed. Ten physically fit, but untrained, male university students served as subjects. The results revealed that exercise performance was unaffected by chronobiological effects. Similarly, oxygen uptake, minute ventilation and heart rate showed no time of day influences under pre-, submaximal, and maximal exercise conditions. Ratings of perceived exertion were unaffected by time of day effects during submaximal and maximal exercise. In contrast, rectal temperature exhibited a significant chronobiological rhythm under all three conditions. Under pre- and submaximal exercise conditions, significant time of day effects were noted for respiratory exchange ratio, while a significant rhythmicity of blood pressure was evident during maximal exercise. However, none of these physiological variables exhibited significant differential responses (percent change from pre-exercise values) to the exercise stimulus at any of the four time points selected for study. Conversely, resting plasma lactate levels and lactate responses to maximal exercise were found to be significantly sensitive to chronobiological influences. Absolute post-exercise plasma norepinephrine values, and norepinephrine responses to exercise (percent change from pre-exercise values), also fluctuated significantly among the time points studied. In summary, these data suggest that aerobic exercise performance does not vary during the time frame within which exercise is normally conducted, despite the fact that some important physiological responses to exercise do fluctuate within that time period.
以往研究昼夜节律对运动期间生理变量的影响,结果相互矛盾。本研究的目的是在24小时内通常进行剧烈体育活动的时间段内,于四个不同时间间隔(08:00、12:00、16:00和20:00)检查最大有氧运动表现,以及运动的生理和心理生理反应。十名身体健康但未经训练的男性大学生作为受试者。结果显示,运动表现不受生物钟效应的影响。同样,在运动前、次最大和最大运动条件下,摄氧量、分钟通气量和心率均未表现出受一天中时间的影响。在次最大和最大运动期间,主观用力程度评分不受一天中时间效应的影响。相比之下,在所有三种条件下,直肠温度均呈现出显著的生物钟节律。在运动前和次最大运动条件下,呼吸交换率存在显著的一天中时间效应,而在最大运动期间,血压呈现出显著的节律性。然而,在所选的四个研究时间点中的任何一个,这些生理变量对运动刺激均未表现出显著的差异反应(相对于运动前值的变化百分比)。相反,静息血浆乳酸水平和对最大运动的乳酸反应对生物钟影响显著敏感。运动后血浆去甲肾上腺素绝对值以及去甲肾上腺素对运动的反应(相对于运动前值的变化百分比)在研究的时间点之间也有显著波动。总之,这些数据表明,尽管对运动的一些重要生理反应在该时间段内确实会波动,但在正常进行运动的时间范围内,有氧运动表现并无变化。