Schmelz M, Schmidt R, Bickel A, Torebjörk H E, Handwerker H O
Department of Physiology I, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):1653-60. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1653.
Microneurography techniques were used to record action potentials from unmyelinated nerve fibers (C fibers) in the cutaneous fascicles of the peroneal nerve in healthy volunteers. C units were identified by their long latency responses to electrical stimulation of their terminals in the skin. Their responsiveness to mechanical or heat stimuli applied to the skin or to sympathetic reflex provocation tests was determined by transient slowing of conduction velocity following activation (marking technique). In a sample of 381 C units, 59 were unresponsive to mechanical and thermal stimulation of their endings, but responded to sympathetic reflex provocation tests, e.g., arousal or deep inspiration. They were classified as sympathetic efferent units. On average, conduction velocities of sympathetic units were lower (0.78 +/- 0.12 m/s, mean +/- SD) than those of mechano-heat (CMH) or mechanoresponsive (CM) afferent C units (0.91 +/- 0.14 m/s). Endings of most of the sympathetic units were located in the skin of toes or in the foot dorsum. Innervation territories of 16 sympathetic units were mapped by means of conditioning transcutaneous electrical stimuli. Twelve units had one continuous skin territory, whereas two units had two and two other units had three and five separate territories, respectively. The mean innervated area was 128 mm2 (range: 24-350 mm2). Innervation territories of sympathetic units were of approximately the same size in different skin regions on the lower leg, foot, or toes. Based on responses to whole body cooling and warming, two units were tentatively classified as vasoconstrictor and sudomotor units, respectively. Eleven units were tested for responsiveness to iontophoresis of acetylcholine in their innervation territories. In five of them, activity was induced that was not due to central reflex activity but instead due to antidromic activation from the peripheral terminals. Iontophoresis of saline or histamine was ineffective. These findings confirm the existence of excitatory cholinergic receptors in the terminal membrane of some sympathetic units, possibly sudomotors.
采用微神经图技术记录健康志愿者腓总神经皮束中无髓神经纤维(C纤维)的动作电位。通过对其皮肤终末进行电刺激时的长潜伏期反应来识别C单位。通过激活后传导速度的短暂减慢(标记技术)来确定它们对施加于皮肤的机械或热刺激或交感反射激发试验的反应性。在381个C单位样本中,59个对其终末的机械和热刺激无反应,但对交感反射激发试验有反应,如觉醒或深呼吸。它们被归类为交感传出单位。平均而言,交感单位的传导速度(0.78±0.12米/秒,平均值±标准差)低于机械热(CMH)或机械反应性(CM)传入C单位(0.91±0.14米/秒)。大多数交感单位的终末位于脚趾皮肤或足背。通过条件性经皮电刺激绘制了16个交感单位的神经支配区域。12个单位有一个连续的皮肤区域,而2个单位有两个,另外2个单位分别有三个和五个独立的区域。平均支配面积为128平方毫米(范围:24 - 350平方毫米)。交感单位在小腿、足部或脚趾的不同皮肤区域的神经支配区域大小大致相同。根据对全身冷却和加热的反应,分别将两个单位初步归类为血管收缩单位和汗腺运动单位。对11个单位在其神经支配区域进行了乙酰胆碱离子透入反应测试。其中5个单位诱发出的活动不是由于中枢反射活动,而是由于外周终末的逆向激活。盐水或组胺离子透入无效。这些发现证实了一些交感单位(可能是汗腺运动单位)终末膜中存在兴奋性胆碱能受体。