• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

客观方法与主观方法所获注视差异的比较。

Comparison of fixation disparities obtained by objective and subjective methods.

作者信息

Fogt N, Jones R

机构信息

Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 1998 Feb;38(3):411-21. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00142-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00142-9
PMID:9536364
Abstract

Fixation disparities (FD) were measured as a function of forced vergence using binocular scleral search coils and simultaneously with nonius lines. The slope of the objective FD curve was significantly greater than the subjective FD curve for three of five subjects. This indicates an alteration in retinal correspondence of up to one degree, that shifts Panum's area to avoid the diplopia normally present with large disparities. This process allows for fusion in the presence of large objective fixation disparities which would normally cause diplopia. The shift in correspondence enhances the range of forced vergence, since the larger objective FDs serve as more effective stimuli to fusional vergence. The remaining subjects who lacked this effect had "flat" FD curves indicative of high vergence adaptation.

摘要

使用双眼巩膜搜索线圈并同时结合斜视钩测量作为强迫性聚散函数的注视差异(FD)。在五名受试者中,有三名受试者的客观FD曲线斜率显著大于主观FD曲线斜率。这表明视网膜对应发生了高达一度的改变,这种改变会使潘诺氏区移位,以避免通常因大差异而出现的复视。这一过程使得在存在通常会导致复视的大的客观注视差异的情况下仍能实现融合。对应关系的改变扩大了强迫性聚散的范围,因为更大的客观FD作为融合性聚散的更有效刺激。其余没有这种效应的受试者具有“平坦”的FD曲线,表明其聚散适应能力较高。

相似文献

1
Comparison of fixation disparities obtained by objective and subjective methods.客观方法与主观方法所获注视差异的比较。
Vision Res. 1998 Feb;38(3):411-21. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00142-9.
2
A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading.句子阅读中垂直和水平注视差异的比较分析。
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt A):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
3
Horizontal fixation disparity measures with nonius lines.使用纳尤斯线进行水平注视差异测量。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;82(11):988-99. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187843.46805.a4.
4
Fixation disparity and nonius bias.注视差异和偏斜视标偏差
Vision Res. 1999 Feb;39(3):669-77. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00163-1.
5
Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.个体客观与主观固视差异作为强制聚散的函数。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199958. eCollection 2018.
6
Vertical fixation disparity curve and the effects of vergence training in a normal young adult population.
Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Dec;77(12):663-9. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200012000-00013.
7
Disparity vergence dynamics and fixation disparity.
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 Aug;63(8):611-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198608000-00003.
8
Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses.注视差异与集合和发散差异阶跃反应之间的不对称性的关系。
Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(2):253-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
9
Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods.注视差异的客观测量与主观测量在短时间和长时间注视期间的比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Jul;30(4):379-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00753.x.
10
The effect of forced vergence on retinal correspondence.
Vision Res. 1998 Sep;38(18):2711-9. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00448-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The preferred retinal loci when the eyes converge.眼睛会聚时的首选视网膜部位。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.15.
2
Spatial-temporal contrast sensitivity of the eye alignment reflex.眼球对准反射的时空对比敏感度。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 14;12(1):19480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23753-1.
3
Effects of aligning prisms on the objective and subjective fixation disparity in far distance.远距离时,调整棱镜对客观和主观注视差异的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Dec 11;12(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.4.8.
4
A unified model for binocular fusion and depth perception.用于双眼融合和深度感知的统一模型。
Vision Res. 2021 Mar;180:11-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
Comparisons of proximal vergence measures.近距聚散测量的比较。
Vis Dev Rehabil. 2020 Sep;6(3):252-263.
6
Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?iPad注视差异测试的结果与马利特近用注视差异测试的结果是否等同?
J Optom. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):222-231. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
7
Quantitative Approach for the Analysis of Fusional Convergence Using Eye-Tracking and SacLab Toolbox.使用眼动追踪和 SacLab 工具箱进行融合性集合分析的定量方法。
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Jul 22;2018:3271269. doi: 10.1155/2018/3271269. eCollection 2018.
8
Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.个体客观与主观固视差异作为强制聚散的函数。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199958. eCollection 2018.
9
Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.近视力下的个体客观和主观注视差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0170190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170190. eCollection 2017.
10
Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.棱镜眼镜对客观和主观注视差异的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0138871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138871. eCollection 2015.