Rynders M C, Navarro R, Losada M A
Instituto de Optica Daza de Valdés, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Serrano, Madrid, Spain.
Vision Res. 1998 Feb;38(4):513-22. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00216-2.
Longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) of the human eye has been studied repeatedly, but only at the fovea. Poor visual acuity prevents its subjective determination beyond a few degrees eccentricity. Consequently, we have used an objective approach, similar to that of Charman and Jennings [(1976). Vision Research 16, 999-1005], to measure ocular LCA across the visual field. To determine the validity of our double-pass approach, a direct comparison between objective and subjective results was established where possible, namely at the fovea and parafoveally (2.5 deg). In both cases we focused a monochromatic point source at four different wavelengths (458, 501.8, 543.5 and 632.8 nm). At the fovea, for a 3 mm pupil, we found a close match between subjective and objective results. However, as the subjective task became harder (off-axis or larger pupils), subjective results tended to yield slightly more myopic eyes than the results for objective refraction. In all cases, the offset was virtually independent of the wavelength used. Therefore, we have not found evidence of any biased estimates of the LCA, as determined objectively. Our foveal results show reasonable agreement with previous findings, except for slightly smaller amounts of LCA. Starting at the fovea, LCA tends to gradually increase with eccentricity, up to 40 deg, although such an increase is small, just approaching statistical significance. Computation of the LCA using a model eye predicts a slightly smaller increase with eccentricity.
人眼的纵向色差(LCA)已被反复研究,但仅针对中央凹。视力不佳使得在偏心度超过几度时无法进行主观测定。因此,我们采用了一种类似于查曼和詹宁斯(1976年。《视觉研究》16,999 - 1005)的客观方法,来测量整个视野的眼LCA。为了确定我们双程方法的有效性,在可能的情况下,即在中央凹和旁中央凹(2.5度)处,对客观和主观结果进行了直接比较。在这两种情况下,我们将单色点光源聚焦在四个不同波长(458、501.8、543.5和632.8纳米)上。在中央凹处,对于3毫米的瞳孔,我们发现主观和客观结果非常匹配。然而,随着主观任务变得更难(离轴或瞳孔更大),主观结果往往比客观验光结果产生的近视度数略多。在所有情况下,偏差实际上与所使用的波长无关。因此,我们没有发现客观测定的LCA存在任何偏差估计的证据。我们的中央凹结果与先前的发现显示出合理的一致性,只是LCA的量略小。从中央凹开始,LCA往往随着偏心度逐渐增加,直至40度,尽管这种增加很小,仅接近统计学显著性。使用模型眼计算LCA预测随着偏心度的增加会略小。