Gasparini G, Toi M, Verderio P, Ranieri G, Dante S, Bonoldi E, Boracchi P, Fanelli M, Tominaga T
Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Via Melacrino, Reggio Calabria, 89100, Italy.
Int J Oncol. 1998 May;12(5):1117-25. doi: 10.3892/ijo.12.5.1117.
To validate the prognostic value of the determination of p53 expression, intratumoral microvessel density (IMD) (a measure of angiogenesis), and the conventional features, we studied 531 patients operated of breast cancer (271 node-positive and 260 node-negative), with a median follow-up exceeding 6 years. IMD was assessed by using the anti-CD31 antibody to identify the microvessels. p53, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) were determined by immunocytochemistry using the antibodies PAb1801, H-222 Sp2y and KD-68, respectively. The prognostic value of the markers was analyzed by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. In the overall series p53 expression, IMD, nodal status, ER and PgR were statistically significant prognostic indicators for both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the final multivariate model. Likewise, tumor size and menopausal status were significant prognostic indicators for RFS and OS, respectively. In the subgroup of node-negative patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy only p53, IMD, and tumor size were statistically significant in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of node-positive patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, IMD, the number of involved nodes and PgR were statistically significant in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of node-positive patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, IMD and ER (and the number of involved nodes, only for OS) were statistically significant for both RFS and OS in the final multivariate model. Different markers played a diverse prognostic role in the diverse subgroups studied. Angiogenesis was the sole marker which retained prognostic value in all the sub-groups analyzed. p53 retained significance only in the subgroup of node-negative patients, whilst ER and PgR were statistically significant in the subgroups of node-positive patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy or chemotherapy, respectively.
为验证p53表达测定、瘤内微血管密度(IMD,一种血管生成的指标)及传统特征的预后价值,我们研究了531例接受乳腺癌手术的患者(271例淋巴结阳性和260例淋巴结阴性),中位随访时间超过6年。通过使用抗CD31抗体识别微血管来评估IMD。分别使用抗体PAb1801、H-222 Sp2y和KD-68通过免疫细胞化学测定p53、雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PgR)。通过单变量和多变量统计分析来分析这些标志物的预后价值。在整个系列中,在最终的多变量模型中,p53表达、IMD、淋巴结状态、ER和PgR对于无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)均为具有统计学意义的预后指标。同样,肿瘤大小和绝经状态分别是RFS和OS的显著预后指标。在未接受辅助治疗的淋巴结阴性患者亚组中,多变量分析显示仅p53、IMD和肿瘤大小具有统计学意义。在接受辅助化疗的淋巴结阳性患者亚组中,多变量分析显示IMD、受累淋巴结数量和PgR具有统计学意义。在接受辅助他莫昔芬治疗的淋巴结阳性患者亚组中,在最终的多变量模型中,IMD和ER(以及受累淋巴结数量,仅对于OS)对于RFS和OS均具有统计学意义。在研究的不同亚组中,不同的标志物发挥着不同的预后作用。血管生成是在所有分析的亚组中均保留预后价值的唯一标志物。p53仅在淋巴结阴性患者亚组中具有显著性,而ER和PgR分别在接受辅助激素治疗或化疗的淋巴结阳性患者亚组中具有统计学意义。