Bergström Gunnar, Jensen Irene B, Bodin Lennart, Linton Steven J, Nygren Åke L, Carlsson Sven G
Section of Personal Injury Prevention, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Örebro Medical Center, Örebro, Sweden Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pain. 1998 Mar;75(1):101-110. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00210-8.
The psychological assessment of chronic pain is often accomplished using questionnaires such as the (West Haven-Yale) Multidimensional Pain Inventory ((WHY)MPI) which is constructed to capture the multidimensionality of chronic pain. The (WHY)MPI theoretically originates from behavioural and cognitive behavioural theories of pain. It is divided into three parts and measures psychosocial and behavioural consequences of pain. This questionnaire has displayed satisfactory psychometric properties and translations of the original English version into German and Dutch have been demonstrated to be reliable and valid. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and factor structure of a Swedish translation of the (WHY)MPI, the MPI-S, and also to test the generalisability of the factor structure found for the (WHY)MPI. We performed analyses of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and carried out a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) employing LISREL-8 on a population of 682 patients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain. Test-retest analysis was accomplished on a sub-sample of 54 individuals taken from the aforementioned population. For sections 1 and 2 of the MPI-S the overall reliability and stability were good, and after the exclusion of four items, the factor structure was similar to other versions of the MPI. For section 3, despite removal of five questions, the proposed factor structure could not be replicated. This part of the inventory is designed to measure the extent of different types of activities, and our results suggest that this section may only be used for assessing general activity level. We conclude that, with a few adjustments, the analyses yielded satisfactory results for sections 1 and 2 of the MPI-S regarding its factor structure, reliability and generalisability. For section 3 the hypothesised factor structure could not be confirmed.
慢性疼痛的心理评估通常使用问卷来完成,例如(韦斯特黑文 - 耶鲁)多维疼痛量表((WHY)MPI),该量表旨在捕捉慢性疼痛的多维度特征。(WHY)MPI理论上源于疼痛的行为和认知行为理论。它分为三个部分,用于测量疼痛的心理社会和行为后果。该问卷已显示出令人满意的心理测量特性,并且其原始英文版本翻译成德语和荷兰语后已被证明是可靠且有效的。本研究的目的是测试(WHY)MPI瑞典语翻译版MPI - S的信度和因子结构,并检验(WHY)MPI所发现的因子结构的可推广性。我们使用克朗巴哈系数进行内部一致性分析,并对682名患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者群体采用LISREL - 8进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。对从上述群体中抽取的54名个体的子样本进行了重测分析。对于MPI - S的第1和第2部分,总体信度和稳定性良好,在排除四个项目后,因子结构与MPI的其他版本相似。对于第3部分,尽管删除了五个问题,但所提出的因子结构无法复制。该量表的这一部分旨在测量不同类型活动的程度,我们的结果表明这一部分可能仅用于评估一般活动水平。我们得出结论,经过一些调整后,关于MPI - S第1和第2部分的因子结构、信度和可推广性,分析得出了令人满意的结果。对于第3部分,假设的因子结构无法得到证实。