Marks J M, Ponsky J L, Shillingstad R B, Singh J
Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):327-30. doi: 10.1007/s004649900663.
Biliary fistulae may occur following surgical injury, abdominal trauma, or inadequate closure of a cystic duct stump. These leaks are most often managed by drainage of the associate biloma and either endoscopic sphincterotomy or placement of a biliary endoprosthesis to decrease the pressure gradient between the bile duct and the duodenum created by the muscular contraction of the ampullary sphincter. In a previous study, we demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in ductal pressures following stent placement as compared to sphincterotomy. The goal of this present study was to determine if reduction in ductal pressures correlates clinically with the resolution of biliary leaks in an animal model.
Fourteen mongrel dogs underwent laparotomy, cholecystectomy without closure of the cystic stump, and a lateral duodenotomy to identify the major papilla. The dogs were then randomized into three groups. Group I (n = 5) was a control group undergoing closure of the duodenotomy only. Group II (n = 4) underwent sphincterotomy. Group III (n = 5) underwent placement of a 7 Fr x 5 cm biliary endoprosthesis prior to duodenotomy closure. A drain was placed adjacent to the cystic duct stump in all groups. Drain output was recorded daily. The biliary leak was considered resolved when the output was < 10 cc/day. Regardless of suspected fistula closure, the drains were not removed until 2 weeks postprocedure. Necropsy was performed to identify undrained intraperitoneal bile. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's paired t test.
All dogs had bile leaks identified on postoperative day 1. The number of days required for resolution of bile leak in group I (mean +/- SEM) was 7.60 +/- 0.87 days, as compared to 6.75 +/- 0.80 days for group II and 2.60 +/- 0.24 days for group III. There was no significant difference in the duration of bile leak between groups I and II (p = 0.445). Group III, however, had a significant reduction in the duration of biliary fistulae as compared to both groups I and II (p < 0.005). At autopsy, persistent bilomas were identified in 80% of group I, 25% of group II, and 0% of group III. None of the dogs showed evidence of dehisence of the duodenotomy closure site as a source of bile leak.
Biliary stenting significantly reduces the time to resolution of cystic duct leaks as compared to sphincterotomy in a canine model. The results obtained in this study support the use of biliary endoprostheses in the management of biliary leaks and fistulae.
胆瘘可能发生于手术损伤、腹部创伤或胆囊管残端闭合不全之后。这些胆瘘通常通过引流相关胆汁瘤以及进行内镜括约肌切开术或放置胆道内支架来处理,以降低壶腹括约肌肌肉收缩所造成的胆管与十二指肠之间的压力梯度。在先前的一项研究中,我们证明与括约肌切开术相比,放置支架后导管压力有统计学意义的显著降低。本研究的目的是确定在动物模型中导管压力的降低与胆瘘的愈合在临床上是否相关。
14只杂种犬接受剖腹手术、不闭合胆囊残端的胆囊切除术以及外侧十二指肠切开术以识别主乳头。然后将这些犬随机分为三组。第一组(n = 5)为仅行十二指肠切开术闭合的对照组。第二组(n = 4)接受括约肌切开术。第三组(n = 5)在闭合十二指肠切开术之前放置一根7 Fr×5 cm的胆道内支架。所有组均在胆囊管残端附近放置引流管。每天记录引流量。当引流量<10 cc/天时,认为胆瘘已愈合。无论怀疑瘘口是否闭合,引流管在术后2周前均不拔除。进行尸检以识别未引流的腹腔内胆汁。使用学生配对t检验进行统计分析。
所有犬在术后第1天均发现有胆瘘。第一组胆瘘愈合所需天数(均值±标准误)为7.60±0.87天,第二组为6.75±0.80天,第三组为2.60±0.24天。第一组和第二组之间胆瘘持续时间无显著差异(p = 0.445)。然而,与第一组和第二组相比,第三组胆瘘持续时间显著缩短(p < 0.005)。尸检时,第一组80%、第二组25%以及第三组0%发现有持续性胆汁瘤。没有犬显示十二指肠切开术闭合部位裂开作为胆瘘来源的证据。
在犬模型中与括约肌切开术相比,胆道支架置入显著缩短了胆囊管瘘愈合时间。本研究获得的结果支持在胆瘘和胆瘘的管理中使用胆道内支架。