Asenbaum S, Brücke T, Pirker W, Pietrzyk U, Podreka I
Department of Neurology, University of Vienna, Austria.
J Nucl Med. 1998 Apr;39(4):613-8.
Because 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD are both used for SPECT imaging of cerebral blood flow, the question arises whether there are any differences in their respective regional cerebral distribution. For that purpose, visual and semiquantitative comparisons between 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD studies were performed.
Seventeen patients (4 women; 13 men; age 45-89 yr; mean age 71 yr) with various neurological diseases, except acute/subacute stroke, were investigated twice with 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD using a triple-headed rotating SPECT camera. After image reorientation, the two studies were evaluated visually. Seventy regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually and the same set of ROIs was applied in both studies. Regional indices (RI) normalized to individual brain values were calculated and first compared between two random patient groups. Second, for all patients, RI for 70 and later for 27 regions (gained after summing values of corresponding regions in different brain slices) were compared by using a paired Student's t-test applying Bonferroni's correction.
Visual evaluation demonstrated relatively high 99mTc-ECD uptake in occipital and comparatively low uptake in mediotemporal regions. Calculation of RI revealed significantly higher values in the right cerebellum, brainstem, mediotemporal regions, right basal ganglia and the thalamus in the 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT studies and higher values in the occipital, supratemporal/inferior parietal and parietal cortex in the 99mTc-ECD SPECT studies, respectively.
Significant differences in regional tracer distribution between 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD could be detected, probably caused by different tracer kinetics. The results indicate that direct comparisons of studies performed with 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD are not possible and the use of either tracer can be favorable in different clinical questions.
由于99mTc-HMPAO和99mTc-ECD均用于脑血流的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像,因此出现了它们各自的脑区分布是否存在差异的问题。为此,对99mTc-HMPAO和99mTc-ECD研究进行了视觉和半定量比较。
17例患有各种神经系统疾病(急性/亚急性卒中除外)的患者(4名女性;13名男性;年龄45 - 89岁;平均年龄71岁)使用三头旋转SPECT相机分别接受99mTc-HMPAO和99mTc-ECD检查两次。图像重新定位后,对两项研究进行视觉评估。手动绘制70个感兴趣区域(ROI),并在两项研究中应用相同的ROI集。计算归一化到个体脑值的区域指数(RI),首先在两个随机患者组之间进行比较。其次,对于所有患者,使用应用Bonferroni校正的配对学生t检验比较70个区域的RI,随后比较27个区域(通过对不同脑切片中相应区域的值求和获得)的RI。
视觉评估显示枕叶99mTc-ECD摄取相对较高,而颞中区域摄取相对较低。RI计算显示,在99mTc-HMPAO SPECT研究中,右侧小脑、脑干、颞中区域、右侧基底神经节和丘脑的值显著更高,而在99mTc-ECD SPECT研究中,枕叶、颞上/顶下和顶叶皮质的值更高。
可以检测到99mTc-HMPAO和99mTc-ECD之间区域示踪剂分布的显著差异,这可能是由不同的示踪剂动力学引起的。结果表明,对使用99mTc-HMPAO和99mTc-ECD进行的研究进行直接比较是不可能的,并且在不同的临床问题中使用任何一种示踪剂都可能是有利的。