Suppr超能文献

肥胖高血压患者夜间血压降低情况以及对利尿剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的降压反应。TROPHY研究组

Nocturnal reduction of blood pressure and the antihypertensive response to a diuretic or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in obese hypertensive patients. TROPHY Study Group.

作者信息

Weir M R, Reisin E, Falkner B, Hutchinson H G, Sha L, Tuck M L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. mweirumppalab.umd.edu.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1998 Aug;11(8 Pt 1):914-20. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00087-9.

Abstract

During a 12-week, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for the treatment of obesity-related hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring was performed both at baseline and at study completion in 124 patients. Patients were randomized to three groups: placebo, lisinopril (10, 20, or 40 mg/day), or HCTZ (12.5, 25, or 50 mg/day). All groups were matched with regard to sex, race, age, body mass index, and waist/hip ratio. The primary analysis of ABP data revealed that both lisinopril and HCTZ effectively lowered mean 24-h systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure compared with placebo, (mean change from baseline SBP/DBP: -12.0/-8.2, -10.6/-5.5, and -0.3/-0.5 mm Hg, respectively); however, lisinopril lowered DBP better than HCTZ (P < .05). Secondary analyses of groups revealed that men responded better to lisinopril than HCTZ (-11.9/-7.3 v -6.6/-3.5 mm Hg, respectively), whereas women responded well to both drugs. White patients responded better to lisinopril than HCTZ, whereas black patients showed a significant response to HCTZ only. Response to treatment was also influenced by patient classification of 24-h blood pressure profiles, ie, "dipper" or "nondipper." Overall, the majority of obese hypertensives were nondippers. Nondippers (n = 82) responded well to both drugs (-10.4/-6.9 v -12.5/-5.7 mm Hg, P < .05 v placebo), whereas dippers (n = 42) responded to lisinopril (-11.7/ -9.4 mm Hg, P < .05 v placebo and HCTZ), but not HCTZ (-5.6/-4.1 mm Hg, P = NS v placebo). Results of 24-h ABP data show that both lisinopril and HCTZ are effective therapies for obesity-related hypertension and that response to treatment is influenced by sex, race, and dipper/nondipper status.

摘要

在一项为期12周的多中心研究中,为评估赖诺普利和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)治疗肥胖相关性高血压的疗效和安全性,对124例患者在基线期和研究结束时均进行了动态血压(ABP)监测。患者被随机分为三组:安慰剂组、赖诺普利组(10、20或40mg/天)或氢氯噻嗪组(12.5、25或50mg/天)。所有组在性别、种族、年龄、体重指数和腰臀比方面均相匹配。ABP数据的主要分析显示,与安慰剂相比,赖诺普利和氢氯噻嗪均能有效降低24小时平均收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)(基线SBP/DBP的平均变化分别为:-12.0/-8.2、-10.6/-5.5和-0.3/-0.5mmHg);然而,赖诺普利降低DBP的效果优于氢氯噻嗪(P<.05)。对分组的次要分析显示,男性对赖诺普利的反应优于氢氯噻嗪(分别为-11.9/-7.3与-6.6/-3.5mmHg),而女性对两种药物反应均良好。白人患者对赖诺普利的反应优于氢氯噻嗪,而黑人患者仅对氢氯噻嗪有显著反应。治疗反应也受患者24小时血压模式分类(即“杓型”或“非杓型”)的影响。总体而言,大多数肥胖高血压患者为非杓型。非杓型患者(n = 82)对两种药物反应均良好(-10.4/-6.9与-12.5/-5.7mmHg,与安慰剂相比P<.05),而杓型患者(n = 42)对赖诺普利有反应(-11.7/-9.4mmHg,与安慰剂和氢氯噻嗪相比P<.05),但对氢氯噻嗪无反应(-5.6/-4.1mmHg,与安慰剂相比P = 无统计学意义)。24小时ABP数据结果表明,赖诺普利和氢氯噻嗪均是治疗肥胖相关性高血压的有效疗法,且治疗反应受性别、种族和杓型/非杓型状态的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验