Kawahara S, Nagare H
Department of Internal Medicine, National Minami-Okayama Hospital, Japan.
Kekkaku. 1998 Feb;73(2):77-82.
It is obvious that the number of patients with pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections is increasing gradually in Japan. Of these infections, M. avium complex (MAC) is the most common cause, and is known to be resistant to many antimicrobial drugs. At present, no standard regimen which is able to control MAC infections completely is established. For these reasons, the development of new drugs with strong antimycobacterial activity which are not cross-resistant to conventional antimycobacterial drugs is urgently desired. Thus, we studied in vitro activities of various drugs which are expected to be a new promising drug against nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and reviewed clinical impact of these drugs. 1) New quinolones New quinolones including ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and sparfloxacin (SPFX), are considered to be active against M. tuberculosis, M. kansasii, M. fortuitum, but are inactive against MAC, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, M. scrofulaceum. Both AM-1155 and Du-6859a, newer quinolones, seemed to be comparable to or more active than SPFX which is considered to be most active now. 2) New macrolides Clarithromycin (CAM) has in vitro activities against various nontuberculous mycobacteria including MAC, and also has proven to have clinical potential not only for disseminated MAC infections in AIDS but also for pulmonary MAC infections. Therefore, CAM seems to be a candidate for one of the key drugs in the treatment of MAC infections. 3)Rifamycins Rifabutin (RBT) and rifapentine exhibited more potent in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activities than rifampicin. RBT has already demonstrated clinical effect against intractable tuberculosis and MAC infections. Thus, RBT is recommended for the prophylaxis of M. tuberculosis and MAC infections in AIDS patients in US. KRM-1648 displayed much more potent in vitro and in vivo activities than rifampicin against both M. tuberculosis and MAC. It is needed an effort to confirm its therapeutic efficacies. Now clinical phase study is going on in US. 4) Phenazines Clofazimine (CFZ), an effective antileprosy drug, is known to be active in vitro against various mycobacteria including MAC, and often used as a component of combination chemotherapy for disseminated MAC infections in AIDS patients in US. Recently, CFZ new analogs have been developed, and it is necessary to evaluate its activities against nontuberculous mycobacteria.
显然,在日本,肺部非结核分枝杆菌感染患者的数量正在逐渐增加。在这些感染中,鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)是最常见的病因,并且已知对许多抗菌药物耐药。目前,尚未建立能够完全控制MAC感染的标准治疗方案。由于这些原因,迫切需要开发具有强大抗分枝杆菌活性且与传统抗分枝杆菌药物无交叉耐药性的新药。因此,我们研究了各种有望成为治疗非结核分枝杆菌感染的新的有前景药物的体外活性,并综述了这些药物的临床影响。1)新型喹诺酮类药物包括氧氟沙星、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和司帕沙星(SPFX)在内的新型喹诺酮类药物,被认为对结核分枝杆菌、堪萨斯分枝杆菌、偶然分枝杆菌有活性,但对MAC、龟分枝杆菌、脓肿分枝杆菌、瘰疬分枝杆菌无活性。新型喹诺酮类药物AM - 1155和Du - 6859a似乎与目前被认为活性最强的SPFX相当或活性更高。2)新型大环内酯类药物克拉霉素(CAM)对包括MAC在内的各种非结核分枝杆菌具有体外活性,并且已被证明不仅对艾滋病患者的播散性MAC感染有临床潜力,而且对肺部MAC感染也有临床潜力。因此,CAM似乎是治疗MAC感染的关键药物之一的候选药物。3)利福霉素利福布汀(RBT)和利福喷汀在体外和体内均表现出比利福平更强的抗分枝杆菌活性。RBT已显示出对难治性结核病和MAC感染的临床疗效。因此,在美国,RBT被推荐用于艾滋病患者结核分枝杆菌和MAC感染的预防。KRM - 1648在体外和体内对结核分枝杆菌和MAC的活性均比利福平强得多。需要努力确认其治疗效果。目前美国正在进行临床阶段研究。4)吩嗪氯法齐明(CFZ)是一种有效的抗麻风病药物,已知在体外对包括MAC在内的各种分枝杆菌有活性,在美国常用于艾滋病患者播散性MAC感染的联合化疗方案中。最近,CFZ的新类似物已被开发出来,有必要评估其对非结核分枝杆菌的活性。