Peutzfeldt A
Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Dent. 1996 Dec;9(6):259-63.
To compare compomers and conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (GIC) with respect to bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties.
Seven conventional GICs (BaseLine, ChemFil Superior, Fuji II, Fuji IX, Ketac-Fil, Ketac-Silver, and Miracle Mix), three resin-modified GICs (Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, and Vitremer), and two compomers (Dyract and Compoglass) were investigated. Bond strength was determined to untreated as well as pre-treated human dentin. The mechanical properties tested were flexural strength and flexural modulus.
Mean bond strengths to untreated dentin ranged from 0.0 MPa (Photac-Fil) to 8.5 MPa (Fuji IX). Generally, the bond strengths of the compomers and resin-modified GICs were lower than those of the conventional GICs. Mean bond strengths to pre-treated dentin ranged from 0.5 MPa (Photac-Fil) to 13.7 MPa (Compoglass). No clear-cut bond strength pattern was observed for the three types of materials. Pretreatment improved the bond strength of nine out of 12 materials. Flexural strengths ranged from 13 MPa (Miracle Mix) to 180 MPa (Dyract). Generally, the compomers were stronger than the resin-modified GICs, which were much stronger than the conventional GICs. Flexural moduli ranged from 4.0 GPa (Miracle Mix) to 7.2 GPa (Fuji IX and Dyract) with no typical variations between the three categories of materials.
比较复合体、传统玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)与牙本质的粘结强度及力学性能。
研究了七种传统GIC(基线、ChemFil Superior、富士II、富士IX、Ketac-Fil、Ketac-Silver和Miracle Mix)、三种树脂改性GIC(富士II LC、Photac-Fil和Vitremer)以及两种复合体(Dyract和Compoglass)。测定了它们与未处理以及预处理的人牙本质的粘结强度。测试的力学性能包括弯曲强度和弯曲模量。
与未处理牙本质的平均粘结强度范围为0.0MPa(Photac-Fil)至8.5MPa(富士IX)。一般来说,复合体和树脂改性GIC的粘结强度低于传统GIC。与预处理牙本质的平均粘结强度范围为0.5MPa(Photac-Fil)至13.7MPa(Compoglass)。对于这三种材料,未观察到明确的粘结强度模式。预处理提高了12种材料中9种的粘结强度。弯曲强度范围为13MPa(Miracle Mix)至180MPa(Dyract)。一般来说,复合体比树脂改性GIC更强,而树脂改性GIC又比传统GIC强得多。弯曲模量范围为4.0GPa(Miracle Mix)至7.2GPa(富士IX和Dyract),三类材料之间没有典型差异。