Peutzfeldt A, García-Godoy F, Asmussen E
Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Dent. 1997 Feb;10(1):15-7.
To determine the surface hardness and in vitro wear of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and compomers in comparison with a resin composite and to test for a possible correlation between the determined hardness and wear values.
Samples were made of conventional GIC (Ketac-Fil, Fuji II, Fuji IX, Ketac-Prototype = Ketac-Molar), resin-modified GIC (Photac-Fil, Fuji II LC, Vitremer), compomers (Dyract, Compoglass) and resin composite (Z100) for the hardness test (n = 10) and for the wear test (n = 3). The materials were handled according to the manufacturers' instructions. The samples were stored in deionized water for 48 hours at 37 degrees C prior to the determination of Rockwell hardness and three-body in vitro wear.
Hardness could not be measured on Ketac-Fil and Fuji II as the samples fractured before a reading was obtainable. Statistically significant differences were found in hardness and wear between brands and between the four types of material. Surface hardness: resin-modified GIC < conventional GIC = compomers < resin composite. In vitro wear: resin-modified GIC > compomers > conventional GIC > resin composite. A negative correlation between hardness and wear was recorded.
与树脂复合材料相比,测定玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和复合体的表面硬度及体外磨损情况,并测试所测定的硬度与磨损值之间是否可能存在相关性。
制备常规GIC(Ketac-Fil、Fuji II、Fuji IX、Ketac-Prototype = Ketac-Molar)、树脂改性GIC(Photac-Fil、Fuji II LC、Vitremer)、复合体(Dyract、Compoglass)和树脂复合材料(Z100)的样本,用于硬度测试(n = 10)和磨损测试(n = 3)。材料按照制造商的说明进行处理。在测定洛氏硬度和三体体外磨损之前,将样本在37℃的去离子水中储存48小时。
由于样本在获得读数之前就已断裂,因此无法对Ketac-Fil和Fuji II进行硬度测量。在不同品牌之间以及四种材料类型之间,硬度和磨损存在统计学上的显著差异。表面硬度:树脂改性GIC<常规GIC = 复合体<树脂复合材料。体外磨损:树脂改性GIC>复合体>常规GIC>树脂复合材料。记录到硬度与磨损之间呈负相关。