Cobb D S, Reinhardt J W, Vargas M A
Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1001, USA.
Am J Dent. 1997 Apr;10(2):62-5.
To determine whether the use of two HEMA-containing dentin desensitizing agents [Health-Dent Desensitizer with fluoride (H) or Gluma Desensitizer (G)], when applied at simulated "cavity preparation" and "cementation" appointments, affects the bond strength of lab processed resin composite restorations cemented to dentin.
The occlusal surfaces of 70 teeth were ground flat to expose dentin and polished to 600 grit. Teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 10). The treatments were applied in two sessions in order to simulate cavity preparation and cementation appointments. Water (W) was applied as a control instead of a desensitizing agent. H or G were applied for 30 seconds with a rubbing motion (1) at preparation appointment (HW and GW), or (2) at cementation appointment, after etching (WH and WG), or (3) at both sessions (HH and GG). In the control group, water was applied at both sessions (WW). All-Bond 2 and Dual Cement were used according to manufacturers' instructions to cement pre-polymerized resin composite cylinders (4 mm diameter) to the dentin surfaces using a force of 1.0 MPa. Specimens were thermocycled 300x and tested in shear until failure. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at alpha = 0.05.
Mean bond strength and standard deviations are reported in MPa: GW = 7.4 +/- 6.0; WW = 7.7 +/- 5.8; HW = 8.2 +/- 4.3; WH = 10.8 +/- 6.2; GG = 13.5 +/- 6.0; HH = 13.8 +/- 7.1; WG = 19.9 +/- 8.8. There were no significant differences in bond strengths for GW, WW, HW, WH and GG. Shear bond strength for WG and HH was significantly higher than all groups except for GG. Results of this in vitro study indicate that the use of desensitizers at the preparation and/or cementation appointment does not interfere with bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.
确定两种含甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)的牙本质脱敏剂[含氟健康牙本质脱敏剂(H)或Gluma脱敏剂(G)]在模拟“窝洞预备”和“黏结”操作时使用,是否会影响实验室加工的树脂复合材料修复体与牙本质黏结的黏结强度。
将70颗牙齿的咬合面磨平以暴露牙本质,并抛光至600目。牙齿随机分为七组(n = 10)。为模拟窝洞预备和黏结操作,分两个阶段进行处理。用水(W)作为对照,不使用脱敏剂。在预备阶段(HW和GW),或(2)在酸蚀后黏结阶段(WH和WG),或(3)在两个阶段都使用H或G,并以摩擦动作涂抹30秒。在对照组中,两个阶段均用水处理(WW)。按照制造商的说明,使用全粘结剂2和双固化粘结剂,以1.0 MPa的力将预聚合的树脂复合材料圆柱体(直径4 mm)粘结到牙本质表面。对标本进行300次热循环测试,并进行剪切测试直至破坏。使用单向方差分析和Tukey's HSD检验在α = 0.05水平分析数据。
平均黏结强度和标准差以MPa表示:GW = 7.4 +/- 6.0;WW = 7.7 +/- 5.8;HW = 8.2 +/- 4.3;WH = 10.8 +/- 6.2;GG = 13.5 +/- 6.0;HH = 13.8 +/- 7.1;WG = 19.9 +/- 8.8。GW、WW、HW、WH和GG的黏结强度无显著差异。WG和HH的剪切黏结强度显著高于除GG之外的所有组。这项体外研究的结果表明,在预备阶段和/或黏结阶段使用脱敏剂不会干扰树脂粘结剂与牙本质的黏结强度。