Giurea A, Paternostro T, Heinz-Peer G, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F
Department of Medical Computer Science, University of Vienna, Austria.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Mar;80(2):284-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b2.8179.
We compared two methods of reconstruction of the abductor mechanism in 15 patients after prosthetic replacement of the upper femur, to assess abductor strength and function. Six patients in group I had direct fixation of the gluteus medius tendon and a segment of the original bone to the prosthesis. Nine patients in group 2 had the abductor tendon fixed to the iliotibial band. We assessed clinical function, isometric muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area for each patient. The patients in group 1 had better clinical and functional results (p = 0.059), with average peak torques for hip abduction of 92% of that in the non-operated leg in group 1, and of 57% in group 2. Group 1 had a mean muscle cross-sectional area of 69% and a mean value of strength per cross-sectional area of 134% when compared with the control side. The respective values for group 2 were 52% and 91%. Direct fixation of the abductor muscles to the prostheses gave improved function and higher isometric abductor muscle force.
我们比较了15例股骨上段假体置换术后重建外展肌机制的两种方法,以评估外展肌力量和功能。第一组6例患者将臀中肌腱及一段原骨直接固定于假体。第二组9例患者将外展肌腱固定于髂胫束。我们评估了每位患者的临床功能、等长肌力和肌肉横截面积。第一组患者的临床和功能结果更好(p = 0.059),第一组髋外展平均峰值扭矩为非手术侧的92%,第二组为57%。与对照侧相比,第一组肌肉平均横截面积为69%,每横截面积力量平均值为134%。第二组的相应值分别为52%和91%。将外展肌直接固定于假体可改善功能并提高外展肌等长肌力。