Lauri S, Salanterä S, Callister L C, Harrisson S, Käppeli S, MacLeod M
Department of Nursing, University of Turku, Finland.
Heart Lung. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):133-42. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(98)90021-8.
In this study, our intention was to describe the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care, and the differences of nurses' decision making in Canada, Finland, Northern Ireland, Switzerland, and the United States. The instrument used in the study was a 56-item Likert-type questionnaire that has been used in previous studies and has proved to be a reliable tool. The target group comprised a nonrandom sample of nurses (N = 314) from five countries. The samples are not representative; therefore, the results in these cases cannot be generalized. The results showed that the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care was broadly based, and that there were some country differences in data collection, problem definition, and planning. In contrast, decision making related to the implementation and evaluation of nursing is quite similar in the different countries. Canada and the United States on the one hand, and Finland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland on the other, showed more similarities with each other in data collection, problem definition, and nursing planning related to decision making. Neither experience nor nurse's knowledge structure was associated with different decision-making approaches.
在本研究中,我们旨在描述重症监护领域护士的决策过程,以及加拿大、芬兰、北爱尔兰、瑞士和美国护士决策过程的差异。本研究使用的工具是一份56项的李克特式问卷,该问卷曾在以往研究中使用,且已被证明是一种可靠的工具。目标群体包括来自五个国家的护士非随机样本(N = 314)。这些样本不具有代表性;因此,这些案例的结果无法推广。结果表明,重症监护领域护士的决策基础广泛,并且在数据收集、问题定义和规划方面存在一些国家差异。相比之下,不同国家在护理实施和评估相关的决策方面相当相似。一方面,加拿大和美国,另一方面,芬兰、北爱尔兰和瑞士,在与决策相关的数据收集、问题定义和护理规划方面彼此表现出更多相似之处。经验和护士的知识结构均与不同的决策方法无关。