Suppr超能文献

小皮肤活检标本中基底细胞癌、鳞状细胞癌和毛发上皮瘤的免疫组织学鉴别诊断

Immunohistologic differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and trichoepithelioma in small cutaneous biopsy specimens.

作者信息

Swanson P E, Fitzpatrick M M, Ritter J H, Glusac E J, Wick M R

机构信息

Division of Dermatopathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Cutan Pathol. 1998 Mar;25(3):153-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1998.tb01708.x.

Abstract

The distinction between squamoid basal cell carcinoma and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (or between BCC and trichoepithelioma variants) is usually made readily on the basis of defined histological criteria. However, these differential diagnoses occasionally can pose difficult morphological problems. The stated distinctions are clinically important because the risk of progressive disease is significantly higher with squamous carcinoma of the skin than with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and a trichoepithelioma misinterpreted as BCC burdens the patient with an inaccurate diagnosis that may result in inappropriate surgery. Recent reports have suggested that reactivity with the monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4 is capable of separating histologically similar basal cell and squamous carcinomas, and that the expression of bcl-2 or CD34 antigen is able to distinguish BCC from trichoepithelioma. However, corroborative studies of these contentions are few in number. In order to investigate the usefulness of the stated immunostains in the above-cited differential diagnoses, the authors analyzed 45 basal cell carcinomas and 22 squamous carcinomas, as well as 36 trichoepitheliomas. The monoclonal antibodies Ber-EP4, My10 (CD34), and anti-bcl-2 were applied to formalin-fixed paraffin sections in all cases, using a standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Most BCCs demonstrated strong, diffuse cytoplasmic labeling with Ber-EP4 and anti-bcl-2. In contrast, the squamous carcinomas were uniformly negative for the former marker and only focally reactive for the latter in four examples. 'Peripheral' bcl-2 staining of trichoepitheliomas was noted in 24 of 33 of the immunoreactive tumors, but the remainder were marked diffusely and similarly to most BCCs. Among the latter, immature trichoepitheliomas were diffusely reactive for this marker in 6 of 8 cases. Labeling of epithelium for CD34 failed to discriminate between any of the tumor types under evaluation, whereas staining of peritumoral stroma was characteristic of the majority of trichoepitheliomas and more than one-third of metatypical basal cell carcinomas. These data support the suggestion that Ber-EP4 and bcl-2 are useful in the separation of BCC from squamous carcinomas. Nevertheless, they also serve to caution against reliance upon bcl-2 and CD34 immunostains in attempting to distinguish BCC from trichoepithelioma in histologically enigmatic cases. There is currently no certain method other than conventional microscopy that can be applied successfully to the latter problem.

摘要

鳞状基底细胞癌与基底样鳞状细胞癌(或基底细胞癌与毛发上皮瘤变种之间)的区分通常可依据明确的组织学标准轻松做出。然而,这些鉴别诊断偶尔也会带来形态学方面的难题。上述区分在临床上具有重要意义,因为皮肤鳞状细胞癌进展性疾病的风险显著高于基底细胞癌(BCC),而被误诊为基底细胞癌的毛发上皮瘤会使患者背负不准确的诊断,这可能导致不恰当的手术。近期报告表明,与单克隆抗体Ber-EP4的反应性能够区分组织学上相似的基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌,并且bcl-2或CD34抗原的表达能够将基底细胞癌与毛发上皮瘤区分开来。然而,对这些观点进行确证的研究数量较少。为了研究上述免疫染色在上述鉴别诊断中的实用性,作者分析了45例基底细胞癌、22例鳞状细胞癌以及36例毛发上皮瘤。在所有病例中,使用标准的抗生物素蛋白-生物素-过氧化物酶复合物方法将单克隆抗体Ber-EP4、My10(CD34)和抗bcl-2应用于福尔马林固定的石蜡切片。大多数基底细胞癌对Ber-EP4和抗bcl-2表现出强烈、弥漫的细胞质标记。相比之下,鳞状细胞癌对前一种标记均为阴性,仅在4例中对后一种标记有局灶性反应。在33例免疫反应性肿瘤中的24例毛发上皮瘤中观察到“周边”bcl-2染色,但其余的则呈弥漫性标记,与大多数基底细胞癌相似。在后者中,8例未成熟毛发上皮瘤中有6例对该标记呈弥漫性反应。CD34对上皮的标记未能区分所评估的任何肿瘤类型,而肿瘤周围基质的染色是大多数毛发上皮瘤以及超过三分之一的异型基底细胞癌的特征。这些数据支持了Ber-EP4和bcl-2在将基底细胞癌与鳞状细胞癌区分开来方面有用的观点。然而,它们也提醒人们在组织学上难以明确的病例中,在试图将基底细胞癌与毛发上皮瘤区分开来时,不要依赖bcl-2和CD34免疫染色。目前除了传统显微镜检查外,没有其他确定的方法能够成功应用于后一个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验