Pasini F, Pelosi G, Verlato G, Guidi G, Pavanel F, Tummarello D, Masotti A, Cetto G L
Cattedra di Oncologia Medica, Università di Verona, Italy.
Ann Oncol. 1998 Feb;9(2):181-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1008226025229.
Immunocytochemistry has been proven able to identify tumor cells in bone marrow aspirate (BMA) of patients with SCLC. However, few data exist about the clinical significance of the procedure.
108 BMA taken from 60 patients were incubated with the MoAb MLuC1 (cluster 6) and stained by the APAAP (alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase) method. The serum levels of LDH, TPA, NSE and CEA were also studied in relation to bone marrow involvement by means of discriminant analysis.
Immunocytochemistry of the aspirate with MLuC1 detected positive cells in 23 patients (38%) (38 of 108 samples) vs. 13% of the conventional biopsies studied without MLuC1 (P < 0.001). With respect to bone marrow positivity, three groups of patients were identified: those with no positive cells in the aspirate and negative biopsy (group A); those with less than 10 positive cells in the aspirate and negative biopsy (group B); and those with more than 10 positive cells or clumps in the aspirate or positive biopsy (group C). Group C patients had poorer median survivals than those in the other two groups (5.5 vs. 11 months, respectively, P = 0.01). Discriminant analysis showed that the four serum markers were poor discriminators of the degree of bone marrow involvement, with only 55% of grouped cases being correctly classified.
These results show that detection of bone marrow involvement i) can be improved by the use of MLuC1 ii) is not predictable by conventional tumor markers, and iii) is related to poor outcome.
免疫细胞化学已被证实在小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的骨髓穿刺液(BMA)中能够识别肿瘤细胞。然而,关于该检查方法临床意义的数据却很少。
取自60例患者的108份BMA与单克隆抗体MLuC1(第6组)一起孵育,并用碱性磷酸酶-抗碱性磷酸酶(APAAP)法染色。还通过判别分析研究了乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、组织多肽抗原(TPA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和癌胚抗原(CEA)的血清水平与骨髓受累情况的关系。
用MLuC1对穿刺液进行免疫细胞化学检测,在23例患者(38%)(108份样本中的38份)中检测到阳性细胞,而在未使用MLuC1的传统活检研究中阳性率为13%(P<0.001)。关于骨髓阳性情况,确定了三组患者:穿刺液中无阳性细胞且活检阴性的患者(A组);穿刺液中阳性细胞少于10个且活检阴性的患者(B组);穿刺液中阳性细胞或团块多于10个或活检阳性的患者(C组)。C组患者的中位生存期比其他两组患者短(分别为5.5个月和11个月,P = 0.01)。判别分析表明,这四种血清标志物对骨髓受累程度的判别能力较差,只有55%的分组病例被正确分类。
这些结果表明,骨髓受累的检测:i)使用MLuC1可得到改善;ii)传统肿瘤标志物无法预测;iii)与不良预后相关。