Suppr超能文献

哮喘居家管理中呼气峰值流量监测的依从性。

Compliance with peak expiratory flow monitoring in home management of asthma.

作者信息

Côté J, Cartier A, Malo J L, Rouleau M, Boulet L P

机构信息

Unité de recherche, Centre de pneumologie de l'Hôpital Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 1998 Apr;113(4):968-72. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.4.968.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent consensus reports on asthma management emphasize the importance of using peak flowmeters to accurately assess the degree of airflow obstruction. However, the optimal way to use those devices has not yet been determined.

OBJECTIVES

To assess compliance with peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements in the long-term management of asthma, and identify the characteristics of patients with poor compliance.

SETTING

Asthma clinics from three tertiary-care hospitals.

DESIGN

A descriptive and prospective study of 1-year duration.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six patients with moderate to severe asthma taking part in an asthma education program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were asked to measure morning and evening PEF using an electronic peak flowmeter with a 3-month memory; they were unaware that PEF values were being recorded by this device.

RESULTS

Compliance with PEF measurements was relatively good during the first month (63% of the measurements done) but even with regular reinforcement, fell to 50% at 6 months and to 33% at 12 months. Right from the beginning, 8 of 26 subjects (30%) never or almost never (<5% of the readings done) measured PEF, with seven of these subjects writing fabricated results in their diaries most of the time. At 12 months, 60% of the subjects were measuring PEF <25% of the time, and most of them continued writing fabricated PEF values in their diaries. None of the subjects' characteristics helped us to identify those who had poor compliance with these measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

While short-term compliance with PEF measurements is fairly good, most patients with moderate to severe asthma are not interested in measuring PEF twice daily over a prolonged period. In the current management of asthma, PEF measurement devices can be suggested to those showing a strong personal interest in using them, but should be limited to short periods of time. Furthermore, this study outlines the usefulness of electronic peak flowmeters when doing clinical research where PEF improvement is an important outcome.

摘要

背景

近期关于哮喘管理的共识报告强调了使用峰值流量计准确评估气流阻塞程度的重要性。然而,使用这些设备的最佳方式尚未确定。

目的

评估哮喘长期管理中呼气峰值流速(PEF)测量的依从性,并确定依从性差的患者特征。

地点

三家三级护理医院的哮喘诊所。

设计

一项为期1年的描述性前瞻性研究。

患者

26名中重度哮喘患者参加了哮喘教育项目。

主要观察指标

要求患者使用具有3个月记录功能的电子峰值流量计测量早晚的PEF;他们不知道该设备正在记录PEF值。

结果

在第一个月,PEF测量的依从性相对较好(完成了63%的测量),但即使定期强化,在6个月时降至50%,在12个月时降至33%。从一开始,26名受试者中有8名(30%)从未或几乎从未(<5%的读数)测量过PEF,其中7名受试者大部分时间在日记中填写伪造结果。在12个月时,60%的受试者测量PEF的时间<25%,并且他们中的大多数人继续在日记中填写伪造的PEF值。没有任何受试者的特征能够帮助我们识别那些对这些测量依从性差的人。

结论

虽然短期PEF测量的依从性相当好,但大多数中重度哮喘患者对长期每日两次测量PEF不感兴趣。在目前的哮喘管理中,可以向那些对使用PEF测量设备表现出强烈个人兴趣的患者推荐,但应限于短时间使用。此外,本研究概述了在以PEF改善作为重要结果的临床研究中电子峰值流量计的有用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验