• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压患者中肾对血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦与依那普利的反应

Renal response to the angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 antagonist irbesartan versus enalapril in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Pechère-Bertschi A, Nussberger J, Decosterd L, Armagnac C, Sissmann J, Bouroudian M, Brunner H R, Burnier M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1998 Mar;16(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816030-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00004872-199816030-00016
PMID:9557932
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the acute and sustained renal hemodynamic effects on hypertensive patients of 100 mg irbesartan and 20 mg enalapril each once daily.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients (aged 35-70 years) with uncomplicated, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and normal serum creatinine levels completed this study.

STUDY DESIGN

After random allocation to treatment (n=10 per group), administration schedule (morning or evening) was determined by further random allocation, with crossover of schedules after 6 weeks' therapy. Treatment and administration assignments were double-blind. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was monitored before and after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy. Renal hemodynamics were determined on the first day of drug administration and 12 and 24 h after the last dose during chronic treatment.

RESULTS

Administration of each antihypertensive agent induced a renal vasodilatation with no significant change in glomerular filtration rate. However, the time course appeared to differ: irbesartan had no significant acute effect 4 h after the first dose, but during chronic administration a renal vasodilatory response was found 12 and 24 h after the dose; enalapril was effective acutely and 12 h after administration, but no residual effect was found 24 h after the dose. Both antihypertensive agents lowered mean ambulatory blood pressure effectively, with no significant difference between treatments or between administration schedules (morning versus evening).

CONCLUSIONS

Irbesartan and enalapril have comparable effects on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in hypertensive patients with normal renal functioning. However, the time profiles of the renal effects appear to differ, which might be important for long-term renoprotective effects.

摘要

目的

比较每日一次服用100毫克厄贝沙坦和20毫克依那普利对高血压患者的急性和持续性肾脏血流动力学影响。

患者

20名年龄在35 - 70岁之间、患有单纯性轻至中度原发性高血压且血清肌酐水平正常的患者完成了本研究。

研究设计

随机分配至治疗组(每组10人)后,通过进一步随机分配确定给药时间(早晨或晚上),6周治疗后交叉给药时间。治疗和给药分配均为双盲。在治疗6周和12周前后监测24小时动态血压。在给药第一天以及慢性治疗期间最后一剂药物后的12小时和24小时测定肾脏血流动力学。

结果

每种抗高血压药物的给药均引起肾血管舒张,肾小球滤过率无显著变化。然而,时间进程似乎有所不同:厄贝沙坦在首剂给药4小时后无显著急性效应,但在慢性给药期间,在给药后12小时和24小时发现肾血管舒张反应;依那普利在给药后急性有效且12小时后仍有效,但在给药后24小时未发现残留效应。两种抗高血压药物均有效降低平均动态血压,治疗组之间或给药时间(早晨与晚上)之间无显著差异。

结论

厄贝沙坦和依那普利对肾功能正常的高血压患者的血压和肾脏血流动力学具有相似的作用。然而,肾脏效应的时间模式似乎有所不同这可能对长期肾脏保护作用很重要。

相似文献

1
Renal response to the angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 antagonist irbesartan versus enalapril in hypertensive patients.高血压患者中肾对血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦与依那普利的反应
J Hypertens. 1998 Mar;16(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816030-00016.
2
The antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin antagonism in human IgA nephropathy is potentiated by indomethacin.吲哚美辛可增强血管紧张素拮抗剂对人类IgA肾病的抗蛋白尿作用。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Dec;9(12):2308-17. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V9122308.
3
A randomised, double-blind comparison of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, irbesartan, with the full dose range of enalapril for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.一项关于血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦与全剂量范围依那普利治疗轻至中度高血压的随机双盲比较研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Mar;12(3):203-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000591.
4
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of irbesartan and enalapril in adults with mild to moderate essential hypertension, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: the MAPAVEL Study (Monitorización Ambulatoria Presión Arterial APROVEL).通过动态血压监测评估厄贝沙坦和依那普利治疗轻至中度原发性高血压成人患者疗效和安全性的多中心、随机、双盲比较:MAPAVEL研究(动态血压监测APROVEL)
Clin Ther. 2002 Jan;24(1):126-38. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85010-x.
5
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with mild to moderate hypertension.一项关于厄贝沙坦对年龄≥65岁的轻度至中度高血压患者降压疗效及耐受性的多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Clin Ther. 2000 Oct;22(10):1213-24. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)83064-7.
6
Effects and tolerability of irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with severe hypertension. Irbesartan Multicenter Investigators.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Dec 15;80(12):1613-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00784-4.
7
Randomized, double-blind comparison of irbesartan and enalapril for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.厄贝沙坦与依那普利治疗轻至中度高血压的随机双盲对照研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 May;63(5):368-76.
8
An inpatient trial of the safety and efficacy of losartan compared with placebo and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension.氯沙坦与安慰剂和依那普利治疗原发性高血压患者的安全性和有效性的住院试验。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996 Jul;10(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02627955.
9
Efficacy of SR 47436 (BMS-186295), a non-peptide angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist in hypertensive rat models.非肽类血管紧张素AT1受体拮抗剂SR 47436(BMS - 186295)在高血压大鼠模型中的疗效
Eur J Pharmacol. 1994 Nov 3;264(3):307-16. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)00484-6.
10
Regional hemodynamic effects of candesartan cilexetil (TCV-116), an angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonist, in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats.血管紧张素II AT1受体拮抗剂坎地沙坦酯(TCV-116)对清醒自发性高血压大鼠的局部血流动力学影响。
Jpn J Pharmacol. 1997 Mar;73(3):185-90. doi: 10.1254/jjp.73.185.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronotherapy for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of RCTs.高血压的时间治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析与系统评价
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00731-2.
2
Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂降低夜间血压的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2362880. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension.
高血压的晚间与晨间给药方案药物治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 14;2(2):CD004184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004184.pub3.
4
Nighttime administration of antihypertensive medication: a review of chronotherapy in hypertension.夜间服用降压药:高血压时间治疗学综述。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(2):205-214. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.304. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
5
Dosing time optimization of antihypertensive medications by including the circadian rhythm in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.将血压药物的给药时间优化纳入药代动力学-药效动力学模型以考虑昼夜节律。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Nov 14;18(11):e1010711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010711. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
How Do Antihypertensive Drugs Work? Insights from Studies of the Renal Regulation of Arterial Blood Pressure.抗高血压药物如何发挥作用?来自动脉血压肾脏调节研究的见解。
Front Physiol. 2016 Jul 29;7:320. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00320. eCollection 2016.
7
Timing of Administration: For Commonly-Prescribed Medicines in Australia.给药时间:澳大利亚常用处方药情况
Pharmaceutics. 2016 Apr 15;8(2):13. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics8020013.
8
Chronotherapy with conventional blood pressure medications improves management of hypertension and reduces cardiovascular and stroke risks.使用传统血压药物进行时间治疗可改善高血压管理并降低心血管和中风风险。
Hypertens Res. 2016 May;39(5):277-92. doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.142. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
9
Chronotherapeutics of conventional blood pressure-lowering medications: simple, low-cost means of improving management and treatment outcomes of hypertensive-related disorders.常规降压药物的时间治疗学:改善高血压相关疾病管理和治疗效果的简单、低成本方法。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014 Feb;16(2):412. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0412-x.
10
Comprehensive overview: efficacy, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness of irbesartan.全面概述:厄贝沙坦的疗效、耐受性及成本效益
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:575-92. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S50831. Epub 2013 Oct 7.