Fuchs J, Groth N, Herrling T
Zentrum der Dermatologie und Venerologie, Klinikum der J.W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany.
Free Radic Biol Med. 1998 Mar 1;24(4):643-8. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00322-5.
No data are available on the irritant effect of nitroxide free radicals in human skin. Nitroxides are important biomedical skin probes used in Electron Paramagnetic Resonance spectroscopy and imaging. Our purpose was to study the skin irritation potential of different nitroxide free radical structures in skin of healthy human subjects. We investigated the following nitroxides: Tempo (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinoxy), Doxo (2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-oxazolidinoxy), Proxo (2,2,5,5-tetramethyl- -dihydro-pyrrolinoxy), and Imidazo (2,2,3,4,5,5-hexamethyl-imidazoline-1-yloxyl). Cutaneous irritation was determined in human skin following a single application and after repetitive applications in comparison to the standardized irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). The response was evaluated clinically as well as by a bioengineering method analyzing transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration (capacitance). The nitroxides were classified clinically from nonirritant (Imidazo, Proxo), to slightly irritant (Doxo, 100 mM), or moderately irritant (Tempo 100 mM) after a single application. The TEWL values were significantly increased by Doxo and Tempo, but capacitance values were not changed significantly. In the cumulative irritation test Tempo was scored as a slight irritant (10 mM). TOLH (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-hydroxypiperidin), the hydroxylamine of Tempo, which is the major skin metabolite, did not cause skin irritation after a single or repetitive applications. This may indicate that a loss of cellular reducing equivalents may be involved in the inflammation process caused by Tempo. The order of nitroxide irritation potency (Tempo > Doxo >> Imidazo = Proxo) is inverse to the order of nitroxide biostability in human skin (Imidazo = Proxo >> Doxo > Tempo). In conclusion, nitroxide free radicals are classified as nonirritant to moderately irritant in human skin. Particularly, the pyrrolidine and imidazoline type nitroxides have a low potential to cause acute or subacute skin toxicity.
目前尚无关于氮氧化物自由基对人体皮肤刺激作用的数据。氮氧化物是电子顺磁共振光谱学和成像中重要的生物医学皮肤探针。我们的目的是研究不同结构的氮氧化物自由基对健康人体皮肤的刺激可能性。我们研究了以下几种氮氧化物:Tempo(2,2,6,6 - 四甲基 - 1 - 哌啶氧基)、Doxo(2,2,5,5 - 四甲基 - 3 - 恶唑烷氧基)、Proxo(2,2,5,5 - 四甲基 - 二氢 - 吡咯啉氧基)和Imidazo(2,2,3,4,5,5 - 六甲基 - 咪唑啉 - 1 - 氧基)。与标准化刺激物月桂醇硫酸酯钠(SLS)相比,单次应用和重复应用后,在人体皮肤上测定皮肤刺激性。通过临床评估以及采用生物工程方法分析经表皮水分流失(TEWL)和皮肤水合作用(电容)来评估反应。单次应用后,氮氧化物在临床上的分类从无刺激性(Imidazo、Proxo)到轻度刺激性(Doxo,100 mM)或中度刺激性(Tempo 100 mM)。Doxo和Tempo使TEWL值显著升高,但电容值无显著变化。在累积刺激试验中,Tempo被评为轻度刺激物(10 mM)。TOLH(2,2,6,6 - 四甲基 - 1 - 羟基哌啶)是Tempo的羟胺,也是主要的皮肤代谢产物,单次或重复应用后均未引起皮肤刺激。这可能表明细胞还原当量的丧失可能参与了Tempo引起的炎症过程。氮氧化物刺激效力顺序(Tempo > Doxo >> Imidazo = Proxo)与氮氧化物在人体皮肤中的生物稳定性顺序(Imidazo = Proxo >> Doxo > Tempo)相反。总之,氮氧化物自由基在人体皮肤中被分类为无刺激性至中度刺激性。特别是,吡咯烷和咪唑啉型氮氧化物引起急性或亚急性皮肤毒性的可能性较低。