• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术不会改变术后感染性并发症的发生率。

Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

作者信息

Klingler A, Henle K P, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Wetscher G J, Szinicz G

机构信息

Department of General Surgery II, University of Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 Mar;175(3):232-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00286-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00286-9
PMID:9560127
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether the laparoscopic approach does decrease the incidence of postoperative infectious complications after appendectomy.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-nine patients were randomized, 87 with laparoscopic (LA) and 82 with open appendectomy (OA). Patients in the OA group had a McBurney incision; LA was performed in the lithotomy position.

RESULTS

Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 75% of patients. The appendix was perforated in 5 patients of the LA versus 2 patients of the OA group. No conversion to the open procedure was necessary. The median operating time was 35 minutes in the LA group and 31 minutes in the open group (P = 0.58). The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopic than after open surgery (3 days versus 4 days, P = 0.026), whereas the time required for return to work was not significantly different (14 versus 15 days). There were 5 (6%) patients with superficial wound infection following LA and 6 (7%) after OA (P = 0.67). Intra-abdominal fluid collections were found in 2 (2%) patients following LA and 3 (4%) patients following OA (P = 0.60). In the LA group, 3 patients presented with intra-abdominal hemorrhage and another 3 developed a paralytic ileus that was treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and as effective as the open procedure; however, it does not decrease the rate of postoperative infectious complications.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术方式是否真的能降低阑尾切除术后感染性并发症的发生率尚不清楚。

方法

169例患者被随机分组,87例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA),82例行开腹阑尾切除术(OA)。OA组患者采用麦氏切口;LA组在截石位进行手术。

结果

75%的患者确诊为急性阑尾炎。LA组有5例阑尾穿孔,OA组有2例。无需转为开腹手术。LA组中位手术时间为35分钟,开腹组为31分钟(P = 0.58)。腹腔镜术后中位住院时间短于开腹手术(3天对4天,P = 0.026),而恢复工作所需时间无显著差异(14天对15天)。LA术后有5例(6%)患者发生浅表伤口感染,OA术后有6例(7%)(P = 0.67)。LA术后有2例(2%)患者出现腹腔内积液,OA术后有3例(4%)(P = 0.60)。LA组有3例患者出现腹腔内出血,另有3例发生麻痹性肠梗阻,均经保守治疗。

结论

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术一样安全有效;然而,它并不能降低术后感染性并发症的发生率。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.腹腔镜阑尾切除术不会改变术后感染性并发症的发生率。
Am J Surg. 1998 Mar;175(3):232-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00286-9.
2
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
3
Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜检查在复杂性阑尾炎中的疗效
Int J Surg. 2009 Jun;7(3):250-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
4
Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的临床结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4957-z. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。腹腔镜阑尾切除术研究组。
Am J Surg. 1995 Feb;169(2):208-12; discussion 212-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80138-x.
6
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: retrospective assessment of 200 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:200例患者的回顾性评估
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):178-82.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):266-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jun;10(6):906-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Submucosal mucoid as a late complication after appendectomy-A case report.阑尾切除术后黏膜下黏液样变作为晚期并发症——病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;58:37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
3
Trends and outcomes in the utilization of laparoscopic appendectomies in a low-income population in Taiwan from 2003 to 2011.
2003年至2011年台湾低收入人群腹腔镜阑尾切除术的使用趋势与结果
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 24;14:100. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0248-x.
4
Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜治疗穿孔性阑尾炎。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14338-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14338.
5
Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:临床结果与成本分析的比较研究——机构经验
Indian J Surg. 2009 Jun;71(3):142-6. doi: 10.1007/s12262-009-0038-z. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
6
Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的随机对照试验结果的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1929-39. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1972-9. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: An Indian perspective.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:印度视角
J Minim Access Surg. 2005 Mar;1(1):15-20. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.15241.
8
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术的比较——随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的Meta 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
10
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: Is this a feasible option for developing countries?腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:发展中国家是否可行?
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan-Mar;16(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.58764.