• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: Is this a feasible option for developing countries?腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:发展中国家是否可行?
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan-Mar;16(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.58764.
2
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的临床疗效
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):574-80. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial from a developing country.儿童腹腔镜与开放阑尾切除术:来自一个发展中国家的随机对照试验
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:2332例回顾性比较研究
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0699-8.
7
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
8
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study on the management of acute appendicitis (simple and complicated) in children under 13 years of age.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗 13 岁以下儿童单纯性和复杂性急性阑尾炎的回顾性队列研究。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021 Oct-Dec;18(4):182-186. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_102_20.
10
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated appendicitis in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中低收入国家的复杂性阑尾炎:系统评价与荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jun;95(6):1096-1107. doi: 10.1111/ans.70103. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
2
Comparison of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术手术部位感染的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2025 Mar 13;17(3):e80530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80530. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Tunisian Experience.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术:突尼斯的经验
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024 Nov 1;59(6):586-590. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24065.
4
Current status of laparoscopic surgery usage in Türkiye: A middle-income country.土耳其腹腔镜手术的使用现状:一个中等收入国家。
Turk J Surg. 2022 Dec 20;38(4):353-361. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5713. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Efficacy and Safety of LigaSure in Laparoscopic Sutureless Appendectomy.LigaSure在腹腔镜无缝合阑尾切除术中的疗效与安全性
Cureus. 2022 May 5;14(5):e24764. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24764. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy with Incision Skin Tissue Retractor vs. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study of the Management of Child Acute Appendicitis.小切口开腹阑尾切除术联合切口皮肤组织牵开器与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿急性阑尾炎的回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2018 Dec;35(12):2176-2185. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0829-3. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Practice, training and safety of laparoscopic surgery in low and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家腹腔镜手术的实践、培训与安全性
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan 27;9(1):13-18. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.13.
8
Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis at Rwanda Military Hospital.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术对比:卢旺达军事医院的成本效益分析
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1225-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3851-0.
9
Conventional Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Laparoscope-Assisted Appendicectomy: a Comparative Study.传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术与腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术:一项对比研究。
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):330-4. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-0824-5. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
10
Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies.低收入和中等收入国家腹腔镜手术的系统评价:益处、挑战与策略
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and complicated appendicitis in children--safe or risky procedure.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Feb;18(1):29-32. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31815b2de0.
2
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
3
IV. The Incision Made in the Abdominal Wall in Cases of Appendicitis, with a Description of a New Method of Operating.四、阑尾炎病例中腹壁切口及一种新手术方法的描述
Ann Surg. 1894 Jul;20(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/00000658-189407000-00004.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
5
Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital?在一家学术医院,我们有能力开展腹腔镜阑尾切除术吗?
Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.026.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):439-48; discussion 448-50. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179648.75373.2f.
7
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1193-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2165-8. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
8
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗确诊阑尾炎的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2005 Mar;92(3):298-304. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4842.
9
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub2.
10
Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.通过比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术的结果来推导腹腔镜阑尾切除术的适应症。
Am J Surg. 2001 Dec;182(6):687-92. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00798-x.

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:发展中国家是否可行?

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: Is this a feasible option for developing countries?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University & Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi - 74800, Pakistan.

出版信息

Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan-Mar;16(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.58764.

DOI:10.4103/1319-3767.58764
PMID:20065570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3023097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of laparoscopic appendectomy is still not well defined in the literature. This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy at a university hospital in a developing country.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) from August 2002 to August 2006 were identified. For each case, a control was selected from patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA) during the same year by systematic sampling. The groups were compared in terms of duration of surgery, requirement of narcotic analgesia, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and the overall cost for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the study period. Median duration of surgery was 82 minutes in LA group and 70 minutes in OA group (P < 0.001). Forty-five patients in LA group and 64 in OA group required narcotic analgesia (P 0.001). Median length of hospital stay (P = 0.672) and postoperative complications (P = 0.779) were comparable in both groups. Median cost of hospital stay was Pakistani Rupees (PKR) 47121/in LA group and PKR 39318/in OA group, the difference being significant (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible in developing countries with similar postoperative outcome and less requirement of narcotic analgesia. The duration of surgery and overall cost were significantly higher and efforts should be made to develop expertise and reduce operative time with resultant decrease in cost. Development of standardized protocols for discharge of patients from the hospital after LA may further reduce the cost and benefit patients in developing countries.

摘要

背景/目的:腹腔镜阑尾切除术的作用在文献中仍未得到很好的定义。本研究旨在评估在发展中国家的一家大学医院进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性。

材料和方法

确定了 2002 年 8 月至 2006 年 8 月期间接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的患者。对于每个病例,通过系统抽样从同年接受开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的患者中选择一个对照。比较了两组患者的手术时间、麻醉镇痛药需求、住院时间、术后并发症和每位患者的总费用。

结果

在研究期间,共有 68 名患者接受了腹腔镜阑尾切除术。LA 组手术时间中位数为 82 分钟,OA 组为 70 分钟(P < 0.001)。LA 组 45 例和 OA 组 64 例需要使用麻醉镇痛药(P < 0.001)。两组的住院时间中位数(P = 0.672)和术后并发症(P = 0.779)相当。LA 组的住院费用中位数为 47121 巴基斯坦卢比(PKR),OA 组为 39318PKR,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。

结论

腹腔镜阑尾切除术在发展中国家是可行的,具有相似的术后结果和较少的麻醉镇痛药需求。手术时间和总费用明显较高,应努力发展专业知识并减少手术时间,从而降低成本。制定 LA 患者出院的标准化方案可能会进一步降低成本,使发展中国家的患者受益。