• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Survival of heat-shocked Yersinia enterocolitica after irradiation in ground pork.

作者信息

Shenoy K, Murano E A, Olson D G

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Jan 6;39(1-2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00114-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00114-1
PMID:9562885
Abstract

Earlier studies conducted in our laboratory showed that heat-shocked Yersinia enterocolitica (45 degrees C for 60 min) are more resistant to a subsequent beat treatment of 55 or 60 degrees C in ground pork than cells not previously heat-shocked. The increased thermotolerance was partly attributed to the production of stress proteins. The present study was performed to determine if the stress proteins produced by heating could also afford protection to the cells to irradiation. As part of the study, the effect of air versus vacuum packaging on survival of Yersinia to irradiation was also examined. Irradiating the inoculated pork at 1.0 kGy was sufficient to completely eliminate this pathogen. The irradiation D value for both heat-shocked and non-heat-shocked cells was statistically the same (0.15 kGy). Neither heat-shocking Yersinia nor packaging under vacuum resulted in increased resistance of this organism to irradiation. In addition, no effect was seen in virulence of the cells after these treatments, when compared with controls.

摘要

相似文献

1
Survival of heat-shocked Yersinia enterocolitica after irradiation in ground pork.
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Jan 6;39(1-2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00114-1.
2
Control of Yersinia enterocolitica in raw pork and pork products by gamma-irradiation.通过伽马射线辐照控制生猪肉及猪肉制品中的小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 Apr 29;36(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(96)01249-4.
3
Radiation resistance and loss of crystal violet binding activity in Yersinia enterocolitica suspended in raw ground pork exposed to gamma radiation and modified atmosphere.暴露于γ辐射和改良气氛下的生绞碎猪肉中悬浮的小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的抗辐射能力及结晶紫结合活性丧失
J Food Sci. 2014 May;79(5):M911-6. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12413. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Survival of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in vacuum-packed or non-vacuum-packed pork at low temperature.致病性小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌在低温下于真空包装或非真空包装猪肉中的存活情况。
Biocontrol Sci. 2008 Dec;13(4):139-44. doi: 10.4265/bio.13.139.
5
Effect of Heat Shock on the Thermotolerance and Protein Composition of Yersinia enterocolitica in Brain Heart Infusion Broth and Ground Pork.热休克对脑心浸液肉汤和绞碎猪肉中肠炎耶尔森菌耐热性及蛋白质组成的影响
J Food Prot. 1996 Apr;59(4):360-364. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-59.4.360.
6
Radiation resistance of virulence plasmid-containing and plasmid-less Yersinia enterocolitica.
J Food Prot. 2002 Mar;65(3):556-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.3.556.
7
Effect of Storage Conditions on Growth of Heat-Stressed Yersinia Enterocolitica in Ground Pork.
J Food Prot. 1996 Apr;59(4):365-369. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-59.4.365.
8
High prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in pig cheeks.猪脸颊中致病性小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的高流行率。
Food Microbiol. 2014 Oct;43:50-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 May 4.
9
Inactivation of Yersinia enterocolitica and Brochothrix thermosphacta on pork by UV-C irradiation.紫外线 C 辐射对猪肉中肠炎耶尔森氏菌和热死环丝菌的灭活作用。
Meat Sci. 2019 Dec;158:107909. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107909. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
10
Inhibition of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O3 by natural microflora of pork.猪肉天然微生物群落对小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌O3血清型的抑制作用
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 May;51(5):990-4. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.5.990-994.1986.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbon Monoxide in Meat and Fish Packaging: Advantages and Limits.肉类和鱼类包装中的一氧化碳:优势与局限
Foods. 2018 Jan 23;7(2):12. doi: 10.3390/foods7020012.