Weinhardt L S, Forsyth A D, Carey M P, Jaworski B C, Durant L E
Syracuse University, Department of Psychology, New York 13244-2340, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 1998 Apr;27(2):155-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1018682530519.
The trustworthiness of self-reported sexual behavior data has been questioned since Kinsey's pioneering surveys of sexuality in the United States (Kinsey et al., 1948, 1953). In the era of HIV and AIDS, researchers and practitioners have employed a diversity of assessment techniques but they have not escaped the fundamental problem of measurement error. We review the empirical literature produced since Catania et al.'s (1990) review regarding reliability and validity of self-administered and automated questionnaires, face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, and self-monitoring approaches. We also provide specific recommendations for improving sexual behavior assessment. It is imperative that standardized self-report instruments be developed and used for sexual risk-behavior assessment.
自金赛在美国开创性的性行为调查(金赛等人,1948年,1953年)以来,自我报告的性行为数据的可信度一直受到质疑。在艾滋病毒和艾滋病时代,研究人员和从业者采用了多种评估技术,但他们并未摆脱测量误差这一基本问题。我们回顾了自卡塔尼亚等人(1990年)的综述以来所产生的关于自我管理和自动问卷、面对面访谈、电话访谈以及自我监测方法的信度和效度的实证文献。我们还提供了改进性行为评估的具体建议。必须开发并使用标准化的自我报告工具来进行性风险行为评估。