• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome of spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients with refractory chest pain.脊髓电刺激治疗难治性胸痛患者的长期疗效
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Apr;21(4):286-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210410.
2
The sustained benefits of long-term neurostimulation in patients with refractory chest pain and normal coronary arteries.长期神经刺激对难治性胸痛且冠状动脉正常患者的持续益处。
Eur J Pain. 2007 Apr;11(3):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
3
Effect of spinal cord stimulation on heart rate variability and myocardial ischemia in patients with chronic intractable angina pectoris--a prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study.脊髓刺激对慢性顽固性心绞痛患者心率变异性和心肌缺血的影响——一项前瞻性动态心电图研究。
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Jan;21(1):33-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210107.
4
[Spinal cord stimulation in refractory angina pectoris -- a case description].[脊髓刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛——病例描述]
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2005 Sep-Oct;39(5):417-9.
5
Spinal cord stimulation of the conus medullaris for refractory pudendal neuralgia: a prospective study of 27 consecutive cases.脊髓圆锥刺激治疗难治性阴部神经痛:27例连续病例的前瞻性研究
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):177-82. doi: 10.1002/nau.22525. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action.脊髓刺激对起搏诱发的心绞痛的影响及其可能的作用机制。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 21;307(6902):477-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.477.
7
Cervical spinal cord stimulation: an analysis of 23 patients with long-term follow-up.颈椎脊髓刺激:23 例长期随访患者的分析。
Pain Physician. 2012 May-Jun;15(3):203-12.
8
Neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord in the treatment of chronic intractable neck and upper extremity pain: a case series and review of the literature.颈脊髓神经调节治疗慢性顽固性颈部和上肢疼痛:病例系列及文献综述
Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):305-11.
9
[Refractory angina treated by spinal cord stimulation. The results of a long-term follow-up].
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000 Mar;53(3):321-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(00)75099-8.
10
Electrical spinal cord stimulation in the long-term treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy.脊髓电刺激用于慢性疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的长期治疗
Diabet Med. 2005 Apr;22(4):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01410.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal cord stimulation: Current applications for treatment of chronic pain.脊髓刺激:治疗慢性疼痛的当前应用
Anesth Essays Res. 2011 Jan-Jun;5(1):20-7. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.84174.
2
Spinal cord stimulation for intractable chronic pain.脊髓刺激治疗难治性慢性疼痛。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Apr;18(4):406. doi: 10.1007/s11916-014-0406-7.
3
Spinal cord stimulation: an update.脊髓刺激:最新进展
Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Jan;5(1):86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.10.066.
4
Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Angina Pectoris.脊髓刺激治疗心绞痛
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2004 Feb;6(1):79-83. doi: 10.1007/s11936-004-0017-4.
5
Syndrome X.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2000 Feb;2(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s11936-000-0030-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of pacing-induced myocardial stress and spinal cord stimulation on whole body and cardiac norepinephrine spillover.起搏诱导的心肌应激和脊髓刺激对全身及心脏去甲肾上腺素溢出的影响。
Eur Heart J. 1997 Dec;18(12):1890-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015197.
2
Refractory angina pectoris in end-stage coronary artery disease: evolving therapeutic concepts.
Am Heart J. 1997 Oct;134(4):587-602. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70040-1.
3
Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectoris.脊髓刺激对难治性心绞痛患者心肌血流的影响:正电子发射断层扫描评估
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Mar 1;77(7):462-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89338-1.
4
Spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris with normal coronary arteriograms.冠状动脉造影正常的心绞痛患者的脊髓刺激
Coron Artery Dis. 1993 Sep;4(9):819-27. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199309000-00009.
5
Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina--long-term clinical outcome and safety.脊髓电刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛——长期临床疗效与安全性。
Eur Heart J. 1994 Jun;15(6):810-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060589.
6
Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction?脊髓刺激缓解心绞痛是否掩盖心肌梗死?
Br Heart J. 1994 May;71(5):419-21. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.5.419.
7
Pain mechanisms: a new theory.疼痛机制:一种新理论。
Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971.
8
Reproducibility of coronary haemodynamics and cardiac metabolism during pacing-induced angina pectoris.
Clin Physiol. 1985 Aug;5(4):359-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1985.tb00756.x.
9
Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris.硬膜外脊髓电刺激治疗严重心绞痛
Br Heart J. 1988 Jan;59(1):56-61. doi: 10.1136/hrt.59.1.56.

脊髓电刺激治疗难治性胸痛患者的长期疗效

Long-term outcome of spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients with refractory chest pain.

作者信息

Bagger J P, Jensen B S, Johannsen G

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1998 Apr;21(4):286-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210410.

DOI:10.1002/clc.4960210410
PMID:9562939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6655300/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Treatment of patients with refractory chest pain remains a challenge. In this study, the long-term clinical effects of spinal cord electrical stimulation were evaluated in 10 consecutive male patients (mean age 53.7 years) with chronic chest pain in a prospective observational study.

METHODS

After placement of the electrode in an epidural position and before implantation of the device, patients were subjected to clinical evaluation, including atrial pacing, in order to document significant antianginal effects.

RESULTS

Spinal cord electrical stimulation abolished or improved pacing time to angina by more than 50% in seven of the patients who subsequently had the device implanted. In three of these patients, the system was ineffective after a period of 3-9 months despite paresthesia in the area of anginal pain with electrical stimulation. The effects of treatment remained satisfactory in the remaining patients (40%) after a mean follow-up of 60 (45-72) months. Thus, a long-lasting clinical response was able to be predicted in 57% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Spinal cord electrical stimulation is one of the few therapeutic options in inoperable patients with refractory chest pain.

摘要

背景与假设

难治性胸痛患者的治疗仍是一项挑战。在本前瞻性观察研究中,对10例连续的慢性胸痛男性患者(平均年龄53.7岁)评估了脊髓电刺激的长期临床效果。

方法

在将电极置于硬膜外位置后且在植入装置前,患者接受包括心房起搏在内的临床评估,以记录显著的抗心绞痛效果。

结果

在随后植入装置的7例患者中,脊髓电刺激使心绞痛发作的起搏时间减少或改善超过50%。在其中3例患者中,尽管电刺激时心绞痛疼痛区域有感觉异常,但3至9个月后该系统无效。其余患者(40%)在平均随访60(45 - 72)个月后治疗效果仍令人满意。因此,57%的患者能够预测到持久的临床反应。

结论

脊髓电刺激是难治性胸痛无法手术患者的少数治疗选择之一。