Guy E C, Robertson J N, Cimmino M, Gern L, Moosmann Y, Rijpkema S G, Sambri V, Stanek G
PHL, Singleton Hospital, Sgeti, Swansea, UK.
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1998 Mar;287(3):241-7. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(98)80125-4.
Serological testing for Lyme borreliosis was compared in 5 European reference laboratories with a total of 79 sera in order to determine variations in laboratory performance. A considerable range of methods were used and several laboratories employed 2 or 3 genomospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. No laboratory relied routinely on a single test and each weighted the significance of the findings of the various tests differently. A difference in strategy between laboratories in high and low prevalence areas was apparent in that laboratories in low prevalence areas emphasised specificity more than sensitivity and therefore produced fewer false positives, but also missed some cases. Overall agreement between the laboratories was poor and it was concluded that there is a need for a quality assurance scheme within Europe.
5家欧洲参考实验室对79份血清样本进行了莱姆病螺旋体病的血清学检测,以确定实验室检测结果的差异。各实验室使用了相当多的检测方法,有几家实验室采用了2或3种狭义伯氏疏螺旋体基因组种。没有一家实验室常规依赖单一检测方法,且各实验室对不同检测结果的重要性权重不同。高流行区和低流行区实验室的检测策略存在差异,低流行区实验室更强调特异性而非敏感性,因此产生的假阳性较少,但也漏检了一些病例。各实验室之间的总体一致性较差,得出的结论是欧洲需要一个质量保证计划。