Lendemeijer B, Shortridge-Baggett L
University Hospital Utrecht, Department of Psychiatry, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1997 Winter;11(4):299-315; discussion 317-20.
This article reports on a literature review of the practice of seclusion in psychiatric inpatient facilities. Attention is paid to the moral debate on seclusion. Most publications consider seclusion as a necessary intervention to manage problem behavior. The first part of the article deals with definitional aspects leading toward concept clarification. The review shows differences in definitional aspects, motives for seclusion, hospital characteristics, and patient characteristics. Data on frequency, incidence, and duration appear to be widely divergent. The experiences of patients who have been secluded are mostly negative, but positive reactions are also reported. In the publications of the last decade, there is emphasis on the contribution of hospital characteristics to trends in use of seclusion. Finally, it is concluded that seclusion is an effective way to manage (potentially) dangerous behavior and that seclusion is an intervention that may create therapeutic possibilities for care.
本文报道了一项关于精神病住院设施中隔离做法的文献综述。文中关注了关于隔离的道德辩论。大多数出版物将隔离视为管理问题行为的必要干预措施。文章的第一部分探讨了有助于概念澄清的定义方面。综述显示,在定义方面、隔离动机、医院特征和患者特征上存在差异。关于频率、发生率和持续时间的数据似乎差异很大。被隔离患者的经历大多是负面的,但也有积极反应的报道。在过去十年的出版物中,强调了医院特征对隔离使用趋势的影响。最后得出结论,隔离是管理(潜在)危险行为的有效方式,并且隔离是一种可能为护理创造治疗可能性的干预措施。