Lendemeijer B
Divisie Psychiatric van het Academisch Ziekenhuis, Utrecht.
Verpleegkunde. 1997 Feb;12(1):15-26.
This article reports on a literature review into the publications on the practise of seclusion. Attention will be paid to the moral debate on seclusion. The major part of the publications consider seclusion as a necessary intervention to manage problem behaviour. The first part of the article will consider definitional aspects and will result in concept clarification. The review shows differences at definitional aspects, motives for seclusion and patient characteristics. Data on frequencies, incidence and duration appear to be different. The experience of patients who are secluded are mostly negative, but positive reactions are also reported. Publications on the influence of the hospital characteristics to the use of seclusion seem to increase during time. Finally it is concluded that seclusion is an effective way to manage (potential) dangerous behaviour and that seclusion is an intervention which may create therapeutic conditions.
本文报道了一项关于隔离实践相关出版物的文献综述。将关注关于隔离的道德辩论。大部分出版物将隔离视为管理问题行为的必要干预措施。文章的第一部分将考虑定义方面的内容,并将进行概念澄清。综述显示在定义方面、隔离动机和患者特征上存在差异。关于频率、发生率和持续时间的数据似乎有所不同。被隔离患者的体验大多是负面的,但也有积极反应的报道。关于医院特征对隔离使用影响的出版物数量似乎随着时间推移有所增加。最后得出结论,隔离是管理(潜在)危险行为的有效方式,并且隔离是一种可能创造治疗条件的干预措施。