Cantor C H, Baume P J
Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Belmont Hospital Campus, Carina, Queensland.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;32(1):8-14. doi: 10.3109/00048679809062700.
The aim of this paper is to explore the conceptual basis of limiting access to potential methods of suicide as a public health measure.
A review of the literature was conducted.
Both physical availability and sociocultural acceptability are important determinants of choice. There is considerable evidence of an association between method availability and method specific suicide rates. There is also evidence that restriction of method availability is often associated with a reduction in method specific suicide rates. There is some evidence that restrictions on method availability under certain conditions may reduce overall suicide rates.
Suicide methods employed by young Australians are changing, with a disturbing rise in frequency of hanging and car exhaust suicides slightly offset by a decline in firearm suicides. Opportunities exist for further reducing firearm suicides and addressing exhaust suicides by practical measures. There are also obvious options for changing prescribing practices with respect to more lethal medications (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants). However, the rise in hanging seems problematic from this perspective and in need of ecological study.
本文旨在探讨将限制获取潜在自杀方法作为一项公共卫生措施的概念基础。
进行了文献综述。
实际可获取性和社会文化可接受性都是选择的重要决定因素。有大量证据表明方法的可获取性与特定方法的自杀率之间存在关联。也有证据表明限制方法的可获取性通常与特定方法的自杀率降低相关。有一些证据表明在某些条件下限制方法的可获取性可能会降低总体自杀率。
澳大利亚年轻人采用的自杀方法正在发生变化,上吊和汽车尾气自杀的频率令人不安地上升,不过枪支自杀有所下降,略微抵消了这种上升。通过实际措施进一步降低枪支自杀率并解决尾气自杀问题存在机会。在更具致死性药物(如三环类抗抑郁药)的处方实践方面也有明显的改变选项。然而,从这个角度来看,上吊自杀的上升似乎存在问题,需要进行生态学研究。