Weissenborn K, Rückert N, Hecker H, Manns M P
Neurologische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
J Hepatol. 1998 Apr;28(4):646-53. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80289-4.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The number connection tests A and B are regarded as sensitive psychometric measures for the assessment of early hepatic encephalopathy. Review of the studies dealing with the diagnostic sensitivity of the number connection tests, however, shows that the scoring of the number connection tests results differs between studies. Most groups define the limits of the normal range by studying small control groups. Others use scores given in the literature without ensuring the comparability of the test versions used. Thus, there is a need for normative data for the number connection test results and for re-evaluation of the sensitivity of the tests using valid scores.
In this study the number connection tests A and B were administered to 249 healthy volunteers (age: 18 to 76 years) to analyze the influence of age, education and occupation on their results. In addition, the age-corrected normative data were applied to 169 patients with grade 0-I hepatic encephalopathy. The specificity and sensitivity of age-corrected and age-independent normative data of the number connection tests were compared.
There was a significant influence of age and education on the number connection test results, but only a negligible effect of occupation. Application of the age-corrected normative data to the test results of the patients with grade I hepatic encephalopathy significantly decreased the sensitivity of the number connection tests for hepatic encephalopathy compared to widely used age-independent normal ranges, but also increased the specificity.
The use of standardized versions of the number connection tests and age-related normative data is recommended.
背景/目的:数字连接试验A和B被视为评估早期肝性脑病的敏感心理测量方法。然而,回顾有关数字连接试验诊断敏感性的研究发现,不同研究中数字连接试验结果的评分存在差异。大多数研究组通过研究小样本对照组来定义正常范围的界限。其他研究则使用文献中给出的分数,而未确保所使用测试版本的可比性。因此,需要数字连接试验结果的规范数据,并使用有效分数重新评估该试验的敏感性。
在本研究中,对249名健康志愿者(年龄:18至76岁)进行数字连接试验A和B,以分析年龄、教育程度和职业对其结果的影响。此外,将年龄校正后的规范数据应用于169例0-I级肝性脑病患者。比较数字连接试验年龄校正和年龄独立规范数据的特异性和敏感性。
年龄和教育程度对数字连接试验结果有显著影响,但职业的影响可忽略不计。与广泛使用的年龄独立正常范围相比,将年龄校正后的规范数据应用于I级肝性脑病患者的测试结果,显著降低了数字连接试验对肝性脑病的敏感性,但也提高了特异性。
建议使用数字连接试验的标准化版本和与年龄相关的规范数据。