Suppr超能文献

用“样条逼近法”进行放射免疫化学测定的计算(作者译)

[Calculation of radioimmunochemical determinations by "spline approximation" (author's transl)].

作者信息

Nolte H, Mühlen A, Hesch R D, Pape J, Warnecke U, Jüppner H

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1976 Jun;14(6):253-9.

PMID:956731
Abstract

A simplified method, based on the "spline approximation", is reported for the calculation of the standard curves of radioimmunochemical determinations. It is possible to manipulate the mathematical function with a pocket calculator, thus making it available for a large number of users. It was shown that, in contrast to the usual procedures, it is possible to achieve optimal quality control in the preparation of the standard curves and in the interpolation of unknown plasma samples. The recaluculation of interpolated values from their own standard curve revealed an error of 4.9% which would normally be an error of interpolation. The new method was compared with two established methods for 8 different radioimmunochemical determinations. The measured values of the standard curve showed a weighting, and there was a resulting quality control of these values, which, according to their statistical evalution, were more accurate than those of the others models (Ekins et al., Yalow et al., (1968), in: Radioisotopes in Medicine: in vitro studies (Hayes, R. L., Goswitz, F.A. & Murphy, B. E. P., eds) USA EC, Oak Ridge) and Rodbard et al. (1971), in: Competitive protein Binding Assys(Odell, W. D. & Danghedy, W. H., eds.) Lipincott, Philadelphia and Toronto). In contrast with these other models, the described method makes no mathematical or kinetic preconditions with respect to the dose-response relationship. To achieve optimal reaction conditions, experimentally determined reaction data are preferable to model theories.

摘要

本文报道了一种基于“样条近似法”的简化方法,用于计算放射免疫化学测定的标准曲线。使用袖珍计算器即可操作该数学函数,从而可供大量用户使用。结果表明,与常规方法不同,在标准曲线的制备和未知血浆样本的内插过程中,可以实现最佳质量控制。根据自身标准曲线对内插值进行重新计算,结果显示误差为4.9%,而这在常规情况下属于内插误差。将该新方法与两种既定方法针对8种不同的放射免疫化学测定进行了比较。标准曲线的测量值显示出加权情况,并且对这些值进行了质量控制,根据统计评估,这些值比其他模型(埃金斯等人、雅洛等人,(1968年),载于《医学中的放射性同位素:体外研究》(海斯,R.L.、戈斯维茨,F.A.和墨菲,B.E.P.编),美国能源部,橡树岭)以及罗德巴德等人(1971年),载于《竞争性蛋白质结合分析》(奥德尔,W.D.和丹赫迪,W.H.编),利平科特出版社,费城和多伦多)的测量值更准确。与这些其他模型不同,所描述的方法在剂量反应关系方面没有数学或动力学前提条件。为了实现最佳反应条件,实验确定的反应数据比模型理论更可取。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验