Goodman S H, Hoven C W, Narrow W E, Cohen P, Fielding B, Alegria M, Leaf P J, Kandel D, Horwitz S M, Bravo M, Moore R, Dulcan M K
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;33(4):162-73. doi: 10.1007/s001270050039.
This paper describes the implementation of the National Institute of Mental Health Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) study's goals of measuring risk factors and competence. The emphasis is on the development and testing of the measures. Relevant constructs for measurement of risk and competence in relation to psychopathology were selected and pilot tested prior to the field trials. A structured interview was developed and field tested using lay interviewers. Using the full sample from the field trials (n = 1285 caretaker-youth pairs), sample means, standard deviations, internal consistencies, parent-youth agreement, and associations with childhood disorder were computed. Descriptive statistics reveal a range of scores and means consistent with norming samples, when available, Internal consistencies were moderate to high. Parent-youth agreement on factual items was excellent and on scales was consistent with the literature. Several strong associations were found between risk factors and disorder, although most were related to disorder in general and not specific to a diagnostic category. This instrument provides a means of obtaining data that will be useful to researchers conducting epidemiologic and clinical studies designed to contribute to the understanding of mental disorders in children and adolescents, including nosology, risk factors, context, adaptive functioning, and treatment.
本文描述了美国国立精神卫生研究所儿童与青少年精神障碍流行病学方法(MECA)研究在测量风险因素和能力方面目标的实施情况。重点在于测量方法的开发与测试。在现场试验之前,选择了与精神病理学相关的风险和能力测量的相关构念并进行了预试验。开发了一种结构化访谈,并由外行人访谈员进行了现场测试。利用现场试验的全样本(n = 1285对照顾者 - 青少年),计算了样本均值、标准差、内部一致性、父母 - 青少年一致性以及与儿童期障碍的关联。描述性统计显示,在有可用常模样本的情况下,分数和均值范围与之相符,内部一致性从中度到高度。父母与青少年在事实性项目上的一致性极佳,在量表上的一致性与文献相符。在风险因素与障碍之间发现了若干强关联,尽管大多数关联是与一般障碍相关,而非特定于某一诊断类别。该工具提供了一种获取数据的方法,这些数据对于进行旨在促进对儿童和青少年精神障碍理解的流行病学和临床研究的研究人员将是有用的,包括疾病分类学、风险因素、背景、适应性功能和治疗。