Reichart P A, Schmidtberg W, Scheifele C
Abteilung für Oralchirurgie und zahnärztliche Röntgenologie, Universitätklinikum Charité, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Eur J Dent Educ. 1997 Aug;1(3):129-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.1997.tb00022.x.
95 of 144 questionnaires submitted by volunteer Khmer medical and dental students on the betel quid chewing habit in Cambodia were evaluated (58 medical, 37 dental). Questions related to the composition of the betel quid, the physiological and oral effects as well as traditional and sociological aspects. Statistical tests showed that there were differences between dental and medical students, particularly relating to the knowledge about oral effects. While 81.1% of dental students knew that betel quid chewing causes oral cancer, only 31.0% of the medical students were adequately informed. Similarly, 51.4% of the dental students knew about the relation between betel quid chewing and submucous fibrosis compared to 8.6% of the medical students (P < 0.001). In contrast, only 18.9% of the dental students thought that betel quid chewing strengthens the gum, while 56.9% of the medical students believed that betel quid chewing would have this effect (P < 0.001). The answers also showed that students do not indulge in the betel quid habit. The decline of the betel quid chewing habit was also indicated by the fact that while 5.3% of students had parents chewing betel quid, in contrast 40% of students reported grandparents with this habit. There are deficiencies of knowledge about the most important effects of betel quid chewing, particularly in medical students. Since both medical and dental students will in their future professional life have an enormous impact on health and health education, it seems justified that the dental and medical curricula should focus on these traditional habits. Proper health education starting in the dental and medical school is warranted in Cambodia and probably also in other South and Southeast Asian countries where the betel quid chewing habit is prevalent so as ultimately to improve public knowledge on the oral and other effects of this habit.
对柬埔寨志愿高棉医学和牙科专业学生提交的144份关于嚼槟榔习惯的问卷中的95份进行了评估(58份医学专业问卷,37份牙科专业问卷)。问卷问题涉及槟榔的成分、生理和口腔影响以及传统和社会学方面。统计测试表明,牙科和医学专业学生之间存在差异,特别是在口腔影响方面的知识。虽然81.1%的牙科专业学生知道嚼槟榔会导致口腔癌,但只有31.0%的医学专业学生了解这一情况。同样,51.4%的牙科专业学生知道嚼槟榔与口腔黏膜下纤维化之间的关系,而医学专业学生中只有8.6%了解这一点(P<0.001)。相比之下,只有18.9%的牙科专业学生认为嚼槟榔能增强牙龈,而56.9%的医学专业学生认为嚼槟榔有此效果(P<0.001)。答案还表明,学生们并不沉溺于嚼槟榔的习惯。嚼槟榔习惯的下降还体现在以下事实上:虽然5.3%的学生父母有嚼槟榔的习惯,但相比之下,40%的学生报告称祖父母有此习惯。对于嚼槟榔最重要的影响,学生们存在知识欠缺,尤其是医学专业学生。由于医学和牙科专业学生在未来职业生涯中都将对健康和健康教育产生巨大影响,因此牙科和医学课程应关注这些传统习惯似乎是合理的。在柬埔寨,可能在其他嚼槟榔习惯盛行的南亚和东南亚国家,从牙科和医学院校开始进行适当的健康教育是必要的,以便最终提高公众对这种习惯的口腔及其他影响的认识。