Kirstein L, Weissman M M
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976 Aug;163(2):102-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197608000-00004.
A patient's refusal to participate in recommended treatment is a problem faced in all branches of medicine. However, psychiatry faces special problems because of its authority to impose hospitialization of suicide attempters, cases were identified where there was indepdent agreement between both the experts' standards and the treating resident psychiatrists that hospitalization was required. Despite this agreement, the patients were not hospitalized because the patients refused. By most criteria, these patients were a high risk group. They had made repeated suicide attempts, used lethal means which eventuated in serious medical consequences, and were still suicidal when referred for treatment. The emergency room psychiatrists reported feeling confused, anxious, and annoyed in dealing with these patients, and the patients signed out against medical advice. A review of these cases indicated that discussions of social control vs. medical responsibility and clear criteria for hospitalization should be incorporated into residency training programs since the emergency room resident faces these tension-producing issues frequently with several different types of patients. Moreover, utilization review criteria may help to set standards which will assist the psychiatrist in making these difficult decisions.
患者拒绝参与推荐治疗是所有医学领域都会面临的问题。然而,精神病学面临着特殊问题,因为它有权对自杀未遂者实施住院治疗,在某些案例中,专家标准与主治住院精神科医生都一致认为有必要住院。尽管达成了这一共识,但患者因拒绝而未被住院。从大多数标准来看,这些患者属于高风险群体。他们多次尝试自杀,采用了导致严重医疗后果的致命手段,在转诊接受治疗时仍有自杀倾向。急诊室精神科医生报告称,在处理这些患者时感到困惑、焦虑和恼火,而患者自行签字拒绝医嘱离院。对这些案例的审查表明,鉴于急诊室住院医生经常与几种不同类型的患者面临这些产生紧张局面的问题,社会控制与医疗责任的讨论以及明确的住院标准应纳入住院医生培训项目。此外,利用审查标准可能有助于设定标准,协助精神科医生做出这些艰难的决定。