Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者与精神科对照人群中抽象性与非抽象性缺陷的比较。

A comparison of abstractive and nonabstractive deficits in schizophrenics and psychiatric controls.

作者信息

Watson C G, Wold J, Kucala T

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976 Sep;163(3):193-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197609000-00007.

Abstract

Chapman and Chapman (Disordered Thought in Schizophrenia, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1973) have suggested that findings of abstract thinking deficits in schizophrenia could be functions of control task artifacts. This paper describes two projects in which the abilities of schizophrenics and psychiatric hospital controls who had been closely matched on a wide variety of vocabulary and nonvocabulary control tasks to perform several types of abstract thinking tasks were compared. No differences on the mean scores of the schizophrenic and control patients appeared on four of five measures used. On the fifth, a logical reasoning test, the schizophrenics were inferior to controls. The results suggest that many of the differences reported earlier between schizophrenics and nonschizophrenics on abstraction tasks may result from the heavy reliance of researchers on vocabulary as a control matching test, and its peculiar resistance to deterioration in schizophrenia. The results also suggest that inability to use logic properly may be.

摘要

查普曼夫妇(《精神分裂症中的思维紊乱》,阿普尔顿 - 世纪 - 克罗夫茨出版社,纽约,1973年)提出,精神分裂症患者抽象思维缺陷的研究结果可能是控制任务假象的作用。本文描述了两个项目,在这两个项目中,对精神分裂症患者和精神病院对照者进行了比较,这些对照者在各种词汇和非词汇控制任务上进行了紧密匹配,以执行几种类型的抽象思维任务。在使用的五项测量指标中的四项上,精神分裂症患者和对照患者的平均得分没有差异。在第五项,即逻辑推理测试中,精神分裂症患者比对照者差。结果表明,早期报道的精神分裂症患者和非精神分裂症患者在抽象任务上的许多差异可能是由于研究人员严重依赖词汇作为控制匹配测试,以及词汇在精神分裂症中对衰退的特殊抵抗力。结果还表明,无法正确运用逻辑可能是……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验