• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感效价联想习得中的个体差异。

Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively valenced associations.

作者信息

Zinbarg R E, Mohlman J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403-1227, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;74(4):1024-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.1024.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.1024
PMID:9569657
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to test the predictions derived from the behavioral activation system and behavioral inhibition system theory of personality that trait anxiety is positively related to the speed of acquisition of punishment expectancies and impulsivity is positively related to the speed of acquisition of reward expectancies. Both studies used a standard approach-avoidance discrimination task with self-report measures of expectancies. Both studies found support for the hypothesized relation between trait and acquisition of punishment expectancies but not for the hypothesized relation between impulsivity and acquisition of reward expectancies. Study 2 suggested that the relation between trait anxiety and punishment expectancy is affected by the type of incentive and the type of trait anxiety measure used. The results suggest that highly trait anxious individuals are more susceptible to developing new sources of anxiety than others.

摘要

进行了两项研究,以检验从人格的行为激活系统和行为抑制系统理论得出的预测,即特质焦虑与惩罚预期的习得速度呈正相关,冲动性与奖励预期的习得速度呈正相关。两项研究均使用了标准的趋避辨别任务以及预期的自我报告测量方法。两项研究均发现支持特质与惩罚预期习得之间的假设关系,但不支持冲动性与奖励预期习得之间的假设关系。研究2表明,特质焦虑与惩罚预期之间的关系受激励类型和所使用的特质焦虑测量类型的影响。结果表明,高特质焦虑个体比其他人更容易产生新的焦虑源。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively valenced associations.情感效价联想习得中的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;74(4):1024-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.1024.
2
Personality, punishment, and procedural learning: a test of J.A. Gray's anxiety theory.人格、惩罚与程序性学习:对J.A.格雷焦虑理论的一项检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;73(2):337-44. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.337.
3
A meta-analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory: on performance parameters in reinforcement tasks.强化敏感性理论的元分析:关于强化任务中的绩效参数
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Nov;12(4):353-69. doi: 10.1177/1088868308316891. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
4
Functional impulsivity and reinforcement sensitivity theory.功能性冲动与强化敏感性理论。
J Pers. 2006 Feb;74(1):47-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00369.x.
5
Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality.在人格强化敏感性理论的行为测试中区分学习与动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Apr;33(4):476-89. doi: 10.1177/0146167206296951. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
6
Personality and conditioning: a test of four models.人格与条件作用:四种模型的检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Aug;57(2):301-14. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.2.301.
7
Reward dominance and passive avoidance learning in adolescent psychopaths.青少年精神病态者的奖励优势与被动回避学习
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1990 Aug;18(4):451-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00917646.
8
The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation.人格问卷强化敏感性理论(RST-PQ):编制与验证
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1427-1440. doi: 10.1037/pas0000273. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Reactive personality-environment transactions and adult developmental trajectories.反应性人格与环境的相互作用及成人发展轨迹
Dev Psychol. 2006 Sep;42(5):877-87. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.877.
10
Self-reported impulsivity in Huntington's disease patients and relationship to executive dysfunction and reward responsiveness.亨廷顿舞蹈症患者的自我报告冲动性及其与执行功能障碍和奖励反应性的关系。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Sep;39(7):694-706. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1257702. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Reward Sensitivity, Pubertal Development, and Circadian Rhythms: A Window into Adolescent Risk for Depressive Symptoms.奖赏敏感性、青春期发育与昼夜节律:洞察青少年抑郁症状风险的窗口。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02224-6.
2
Pattern differentiation and tuning shift in human sensory cortex underlie long-term threat memory.人类感觉皮层中的模式分化和调谐转移是长期威胁记忆的基础。
Curr Biol. 2022 May 9;32(9):2067-2075.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.076. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Human Sensory Cortex Contributes to the Long-Term Storage of Aversive Conditioning.
人类感觉皮层有助于厌恶条件反射的长期存储。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;41(14):3222-3233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2325-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
Reward Responsiveness and Inhibition Traits Differentially Predict Economic Biases in Gain and Loss Contexts.奖励反应性和抑制特质在收益和损失情境中对经济偏差的预测存在差异。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 23;10:1948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01948. eCollection 2019.
5
Affective Disruption from Social Rhythm and Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Sensitivities: A Test of the Integration of the Social Zeitgeber and BAS Theories of Bipolar Disorder.社会节奏与行为趋近系统(BAS)敏感性导致的情感紊乱:双相情感障碍的社会授时因子与BAS理论整合的一项检验
Clin Psychol Sci. 2016 May;4(3):418-432. doi: 10.1177/2167702615603368. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
Low social rhythm regularity predicts first onset of bipolar spectrum disorders among at-risk individuals with reward hypersensitivity.社会节律规律性低预示着奖赏超敏的高危个体双相谱系障碍的首次发作。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Nov;124(4):944-952. doi: 10.1037/abn0000107.
7
Updating versus Exposure to Prevent Consolidation of Conditioned Fear.更新与暴露以防止条件性恐惧的巩固。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0122971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122971. eCollection 2015.
8
The neuroanatomical correlates of anxiety in a healthy population: differences between the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale.健康人群中焦虑的神经解剖学关联:状态-特质焦虑量表与汉密尔顿焦虑量表之间的差异
Brain Behav. 2014 Jul;4(4):504-14. doi: 10.1002/brb3.232. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
9
Individual Differences in Discriminatory Fear Learning under Conditions of Ambiguity: A Vulnerability Factor for Anxiety Disorders?在不确定条件下歧视性恐惧学习的个体差异:焦虑障碍的易患因素?
Front Psychol. 2013 May 28;4:298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00298. eCollection 2013.
10
Behavioral Approach System (BAS)-Relevant Cognitive Styles in Individuals with High vs. Moderate BAS Sensitivity: A Behavioral High-Risk Design.高与中度行为激活系统(BAS)敏感性个体中与BAS相关的认知风格:一种行为高风险设计
Cognit Ther Res. 2013 Feb;37(1):139-149. doi: 10.1007/s10608-012-9443-x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.