Jones R N, Pfaller M A, Doern G V, Erwin M E, Hollis R J
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Mar;30(3):215-28. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00234-4.
Because antimicrobial agents become less effective after the emergence of resistance mechanisms in clinically prevalent pathogens, physicians must utilize local, regional, and national antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance data to assist in choices of appropriate agents. An investigation of the spectrum and potency of eight broad-spectrum beta-lactam drugs (cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, piperacillin with or without tazobactam, and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid) was performed using a common protocol and method (Etest; AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) in 102 clinical microbiology laboratories in the United States. A total of 9777 strains of Gram-negative bacilli were tested from late 1996 through April 1997. Quality assurance measures using three control strains observed quality control failures in 13 laboratories (usually ticarcillin/clavulanic acid or piperacillin), but only 2% of results required deletion. A total of 33.4% of Enterobacter spp. (1977 strains) were either resistant or intermediately susceptible to ceftazidime. Only imipenem (99.6% susceptible) and cefepime (99.1%) remained highly active against strains of Enterobacter, as well as Citrobacter freundii, indole-positive Proteae, and Serratia spp. Ceftazidime-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were detected at rates of 10.3% and 23.8%, respectively. Although these were participant-selected strains, only imipenem and cefepime had broad-spectrum coverage (> or = 97.1%) against these extended-spectrum beta-lactamase phenotypes. A dominant number of these extended-spectrum beta-lactamase phenotypes were reported from medical centers in the Northeast, but a nationwide distribution was observed. Among the nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli (4057 strains), the rank order of susceptibility (percent inhibited at published breakpoint concentrations) was: imipenem (86.1%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (80.1%) > cefepime (77.1%) > ceftazidime = piperacillin (74.9%) > ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (61.6%) > cefotaxime (18.2%) > ceftriaxone (12.9%). The cephalosporins, cefepime and ceftazidime, had rates of resistance for the 3005 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates of 10.1% and 14.4%, respectively. For all Gram-negative strains tested, only two contemporary beta-lactam antimicrobials exhibited > 90% inhibition of strains, imipenem at 93.6% and cefepime at 90.2%. These drugs were superior to the other tested compounds (48.8-84.3%). Ticarcillin/clavulanic acid had the narrowest spectrum of activity (48.8% of isolates susceptible). These results indicate that carbapenems and a new fourth-generation cephalosporin, cefepime, possess usable in vitro potencies against current clinical strains of Gram-negative bacilli, many of which harbored resistance to other antimicrobial agents.
由于临床常见病原体出现耐药机制后抗菌药物的疗效会降低,医生必须利用当地、地区和国家的抗菌药物敏感性监测数据来协助选择合适的药物。在美国的102个临床微生物实验室中,采用通用方案和方法(Etest;AB BIODISK,瑞典索尔纳)对8种广谱β-内酰胺类药物(头孢吡肟、头孢噻肟、头孢他啶、头孢曲松、亚胺培南、哌拉西林(加或不加他唑巴坦)以及替卡西林/克拉维酸)的抗菌谱和效力进行了调查。1996年末至1997年4月期间,共检测了9777株革兰氏阴性杆菌。使用三种对照菌株的质量保证措施在13个实验室(通常是替卡西林/克拉维酸或哌拉西林)发现了质量控制失败情况,但只有2%的结果需要剔除。总共33.4%的肠杆菌属(1977株)对头孢他啶耐药或中介敏感。只有亚胺培南(99.6%敏感)和头孢吡肟(99.1%)对肠杆菌属菌株以及弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、吲哚阳性变形杆菌和沙雷氏菌属菌株仍具有高活性。检测到对头孢他啶耐药的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的比例分别为10.3%和23.8%。尽管这些是参与者选择的菌株,但只有亚胺培南和头孢吡肟对这些超广谱β-内酰胺酶表型具有广谱覆盖(≥97.1%)。这些超广谱β-内酰胺酶表型中的大多数是由东北部的医疗中心报告的,但在全国范围内均有发现。在非肠道革兰氏阴性杆菌(4057株)中,敏感性排名顺序(在公布的折点浓度下被抑制的百分比)为:亚胺培南(86.1%)>哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(80.1%)>头孢吡肟(77.1%)>头孢他啶 = 哌拉西林(74.9%)>替卡西林/克拉维酸(61.6%)>头孢噻肟(18.2%)>头孢曲松(12.9%)。对于3005株铜绿假单胞菌分离株,头孢菌素类的头孢吡肟和头孢他啶的耐药率分别为10.1%和14.4%。对于所有检测的革兰氏阴性菌株,只有两种当代β-内酰胺类抗菌药物对菌株的抑制率>90%,亚胺培南为93.6%,头孢吡肟为90.2%。这些药物优于其他测试化合物(48.8 - 84.3%)。替卡西林/克拉维酸的活性谱最窄(48.8%的分离株敏感)。这些结果表明,碳青霉烯类和新一代第四代头孢菌素头孢吡肟对当前革兰氏阴性杆菌临床菌株具有可用的体外效力,其中许多菌株对其他抗菌药物耐药。