Habas M E, Macdonald I A
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, UK.
Br J Nutr. 1998 Mar;79(3):241-7. doi: 10.1079/bjn19980041.
There is indirect evidence from previous studies that the physiological responses to a liquid test meal may differ from those seen after consumption of a solid meal. The aim of the present study was to determine the metabolic and cardiovascular responses to isoenergetic high-carbohydrate mixed nutrient liquid or solid test meals, providing 2.1 MJ (approximately 70% of which was from carbohydrate), in eight healthy men following an overnight fast. Metabolic rate increased significantly after both meals (P < 0.0001, time effect), but the increase was significantly greater after the solid than after the liquid test meal (0.40 (SE 0.14), 0.26 (SE 0.10) kJ/min respectively, P = 0.001). The respiratory exchange ratio increased significantly after both the liquid and solid test meals, with no significant differences between them. Forearm blood flow increased significantly after the liquid test meal (0.70 (SE 0.33) ml/100 ml per min, P < 0.0001), whilst it decreased after the solid meal (-0.28 (SE 0.16) ml/100 ml per min, P < 0.0001). Heart rate increased on both occasions, but the response was significantly greater after the solid meal (P = 0.02). There were no significant plasma noradrenaline responses, but there were significantly higher increases in serum insulin and blood glucose following the solid meal. Thus, the physical form of a test meal affects the physiological responses to nutrient ingestion.
以往研究的间接证据表明,对液体测试餐的生理反应可能与食用固体餐后的反应有所不同。本研究的目的是确定八名健康男性在禁食过夜后,对等能量的高碳水化合物混合营养液或固体测试餐(提供2.1兆焦耳能量,其中约70%来自碳水化合物)的代谢和心血管反应。两餐后代谢率均显著增加(P < 0.0001,时间效应),但固体测试餐后的增加幅度显著大于液体测试餐(分别为0.40(标准误0.14)、0.26(标准误0.10)千焦/分钟,P = 0.001)。液体和固体测试餐后呼吸交换率均显著增加,两者之间无显著差异。液体测试餐后前臂血流量显著增加(0.70(标准误0.33)毫升/100毫升每分钟,P < 0.0001),而固体餐后前臂血流量减少(-0.28(标准误0.16)毫升/100毫升每分钟,P < 0.0001)。两次测试时心率均增加,但固体餐后的反应显著更大(P = 0.02)。血浆去甲肾上腺素无显著反应,但固体餐后血清胰岛素和血糖的升高幅度显著更大。因此,测试餐的物理形态会影响对营养摄入的生理反应。