Suppr超能文献

第三代头孢菌素应作为成人重症社区获得性肺炎的经验性治疗选择吗?

Should third-generation cephalosporins be the empirical treatment of choice for severe community-acquired pneumonia in adults?

作者信息

Paterson D L, Playford E G

机构信息

Infectious Disease Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1998 Apr 6;168(7):344-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb138964.x.

Abstract

The choice of empirical treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is highly controversial. Our survey of 42 Australian emergency department doctors showed that monotherapy with a third-generation cephalosporin was the preferred regimen for severe CAP (14/42; 33%). We argue that cheaper regimens with a narrower spectrum are likely to be just as effective as third-generation cephalosporins and will have fewer adverse effects on the microbial ecology of hospitals. We suggest penicillin or ampicillin (to cover pneumococci--even if penicillin "resistant"--and Haemophilus influenzae), plus a macrolide (e.g., azithromycin or erythromycin; to cover Legionella and other "atypical" pathogens), plus a single large dose of an aminoglycoside (e.g., gentamicin; to cover gram-negative bacilli such as Klebsiella pneumoniae) as empirical therapy for severe CAP.

摘要

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)经验性治疗的选择极具争议。我们对42名澳大利亚急诊科医生的调查显示,第三代头孢菌素单药治疗是重症CAP的首选方案(14/42;33%)。我们认为,抗菌谱较窄且成本更低的治疗方案可能与第三代头孢菌素同样有效,并且对医院微生物生态的不良影响更少。我们建议,使用青霉素或氨苄西林(覆盖肺炎球菌——即使是“耐青霉素”的——以及流感嗜血杆菌),加用一种大环内酯类药物(如阿奇霉素或红霉素;覆盖军团菌和其他“非典型”病原体),再加用单次大剂量的氨基糖苷类药物(如庆大霉素;覆盖革兰氏阴性杆菌,如肺炎克雷伯菌)作为重症CAP的经验性治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验