• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫、通过NCP系统进行的迷走神经刺激、死亡率以及不明原因的意外猝死

Epilepsy, vagal nerve stimulation by the NCP system, mortality, and sudden, unexpected, unexplained death.

作者信息

Annegers J F, Coan S P, Hauser W A, Leestma J, Duffell W, Tarver B

机构信息

The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, 77225, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 1998 Feb;39(2):206-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01360.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01360.x
PMID:9578002
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine rates of all-cause mortality and of sudden, unexpected, unexplained deaths in epilepsy (SUDEP) in a cohort of individuals treated with the Neuro Cybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) System for intractable epilepsy, and; to contrast the NCP experience with other epilepsy cohorts.

METHODS

A cohort of 791 individuals were followed for 1,335 person-years from implantation. Of the total cohort, 120 individuals had their NCP System devices deactivated. The 15 deaths which occurred during NCP System activation were reviewed for SUDEP by a panel. There were three additional deaths and 242.5 person-years of monitoring after deactivation.

RESULTS

The standardized mortality ratios for NCP System were 5.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-8.7; and for the time period after device deactivation, 4.4, 95% CI 0.9-12.8. Six of the deaths during stimulation were considered definite or probable SUDEP and two as possible SUDEP. Seven were not considered to be SUDEP. The incidence of definite/probable SUDEP was 4.5 per 1,000 person-years and 6.0 per 1,000 person-years for definite/probable/possible SUDEP.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios are comparable with studies of young adults with intractable epilepsy who were not treated with NCP System. These SUDEP rates are not significantly different from those reported in the recent studies of lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), and tiagabine (TGB). The higher rates of SUDEP in the NCP System cohort, as compared with recent drug trials, presumably is explained by the selection of relatively higher-risk patients for the NCP System device.

摘要

目的

确定使用神经控制假体(NCP)系统治疗顽固性癫痫的患者队列中的全因死亡率以及癫痫猝死(SUDEP)的发生率,并将NCP的治疗经验与其他癫痫队列进行对比。

方法

对791名患者植入后进行了1335人年的随访。在整个队列中,有120名患者的NCP系统装置被停用。一个专家小组对NCP系统激活期间发生的15例死亡病例进行了SUDEP审查。停用后又发生了3例死亡,并进行了242.5人年的监测。

结果

NCP系统的标准化死亡率为5.3,95%置信区间(CI)为3.0 - 8.7;装置停用后的时间段内,标准化死亡率为4.4,95%CI为0.9 - 12.8。刺激期间的15例死亡中,6例被认为是明确或可能的SUDEP,2例为可能的SUDEP。7例不被认为是SUDEP。明确/可能的SUDEP发生率为每1000人年4.5例,明确/可能/可能的SUDEP发生率为每1000人年6.0例。

结论

死亡率和标准化死亡率与未接受NCP系统治疗的顽固性癫痫青年成人研究结果相当。这些SUDEP发生率与最近关于拉莫三嗪(LTG)、加巴喷丁(GBP)和噻加宾(TGB)的研究报告的发生率没有显著差异。与最近的药物试验相比,NCP系统队列中较高的SUDEP发生率可能是由于NCP系统装置选择了相对高风险的患者。

相似文献

1
Epilepsy, vagal nerve stimulation by the NCP system, mortality, and sudden, unexpected, unexplained death.癫痫、通过NCP系统进行的迷走神经刺激、死亡率以及不明原因的意外猝死
Epilepsia. 1998 Feb;39(2):206-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01360.x.
2
Epilepsy, vagal nerve stimulation by the NCP system, all-cause mortality, and sudden, unexpected, unexplained death.癫痫、通过NCP系统进行迷走神经刺激、全因死亡率以及突然、意外、不明原因死亡。
Epilepsia. 2000 May;41(5):549-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00208.x.
3
Mortality and SUDEP in epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation.癫痫患者迷走神经刺激治疗的死亡率和猝倒性癫痫猝死。
Epilepsia. 2015 Feb;56(2):291-6. doi: 10.1111/epi.12888. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
4
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy: observations from a large clinical development program.癫痫性不明原因猝死:来自大型临床开发项目的观察结果
Epilepsia. 1997 Jan;38(1):47-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01076.x.
5
Mortality from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in a cohort of adults with intellectual disability.一组成年智障患者中癫痫性意外猝死(SUDEP)的死亡率。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Jun;58(6):508-20. doi: 10.1111/jir.12047. Epub 2013 May 7.
6
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in lamotrigine randomized-controlled trials.拉莫三嗪随机对照试验中的癫痫猝死。
Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):135-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03689.x. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
7
Increased risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in females using lamotrigine: a nested, case-control study.使用拉莫三嗪的女性癫痫患者突发意外死亡风险增加:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Epilepsia. 2012 Feb;53(2):258-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03334.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
8
Risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in patients given adjunctive antiepileptic treatment for refractory seizures: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomised trials.抗癫痫药物辅助治疗耐药性癫痫患者的突发意外死亡风险:安慰剂对照随机试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Nov;10(11):961-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70193-4. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
9
Mortality in a population-based cohort of epilepsy surgery patients.基于人群的癫痫手术患者队列中的死亡率。
Epilepsia. 2003 Apr;44(4):575-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.03302.x.
10
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in New Zealand; a retrospective review.新西兰癫痫性猝死(SUDEP);一项回顾性研究。
N Z Med J. 2020 Jan 17;133(1508):65-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications and Mortality Rate of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫的并发症及死亡率
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63842. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The role of sleep state and time of day in modulating breathing in epilepsy: implications for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.睡眠状态和时间在癫痫呼吸调节中的作用:对癫痫猝死的影响。
Front Neural Circuits. 2022 Aug 23;16:983211. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.983211. eCollection 2022.
3
Association Between Standardized Mortality Ratio and Utilization of Care in US Veterans With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Compared With All US Veterans and the US General Population.
与所有美国退伍军人和美国普通人群相比,美国耐药性癫痫退伍军人的标准化死亡率比与护理利用率之间的关系。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;79(9):879-887. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2290.
4
All-cause mortality and SUDEP in a surgical epilepsy population.手术治疗癫痫患者的全因死亡率和不明原因猝死。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Jul;108:107093. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107093. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Treatments for the prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP).预防癫痫性猝死(SUDEP)的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 2;4(4):CD011792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011792.pub3.
6
Let's talk SUDEP.我们来谈谈癫痫性猝死。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019 Sep 5;56(4):292-301. doi: 10.29399/npa.23663. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
New onset syncopal events following vagus nerve stimulator implantation might be key to preventing vagus nerve stimulation-induced symptomatic bradycardia - A case report and review.迷走神经刺激器植入后新发晕厥事件可能是预防迷走神经刺激引起的症状性心动过缓的关键——病例报告及综述
Epilepsy Behav Case Rep. 2018 Apr 25;10:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ebcr.2018.04.004. eCollection 2018.
8
Ranking the Leading Risk Factors for Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy.癫痫猝死主要危险因素的排名
Front Neurol. 2017 Sep 21;8:473. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00473. eCollection 2017.
9
Treatments for the prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP).预防癫痫性猝死(SUDEP)的治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 19;7(7):CD011792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011792.pub2.
10
Alteration of cardiac autonomic function in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.新诊断癫痫患者心脏自主神经功能的改变。
Physiol Rep. 2016 Jun;4(11). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12826.