Lin B S, Huang T P, Tang G J, Tarng D C, Kong C W
Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan/ROC.
Nephron. 1998;78(4):423-8. doi: 10.1159/000044971.
A reliable temporary vascular access is always required for hemodialysis when a permanent vascular access is not available. However, techniques for creating temporary vascular accesses remain imperfect. This study utilized the 'SiteRite' ultrasound device to improve both success and complication rates of jugular venous cannulation for temporary access.
This prospective, comparative study recruited 104 uremic patients receiving ultrasound-guided and 86 patients undergoing landmark-guided percutaneous internal jugular venous cannulation of dual-lumen dialysis catheters. Success rate, number of puncture attempts, access time, and the complication rate of the ultrasound technique, in comparison with the landmark-guided technique, were studied.
The ultrasound-guided cannulation was superior to the external landmark-guided cannulation in overall success rate (99.0 vs. 86.0%, p < 0.01), success rate of the first puncture attempt (80.8 vs. 34.9%, p < 0.01), average puncture (access) times (15.8 vs. 43.7 s, p < 0.01), puncture trials (1.39 vs. 2.58, p < 0.01), and traumatic complication rate (1.9 vs. 1 1.6%, p = 0.015). The incidence of infective complications for the ultrasound group was not different from that of the landmark-guided groups (2.9 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.589).
The ultrasound-guided technique offers both safety and convenience in inserting jugular venous dialysis catheters. It represents a valuable technique in creating temporary dialysis hemoaccesses.
当无法建立永久性血管通路时,血液透析总是需要可靠的临时性血管通路。然而,建立临时性血管通路的技术仍不完善。本研究使用“SiteRite”超声设备来提高颈静脉置管建立临时性通路的成功率并降低并发症发生率。
这项前瞻性对照研究招募了104例接受超声引导下双腔透析导管经皮颈内静脉置管的尿毒症患者和86例接受体表标志引导下经皮颈内静脉置管的患者。研究了超声引导技术与体表标志引导技术相比的成功率、穿刺尝试次数、置管时间和并发症发生率。
超声引导下置管在总体成功率(99.0%对86.0%;p<0.01)、首次穿刺尝试成功率(80.8%对34.9%;p<0.01)、平均穿刺(置管)时间(15.8秒对43.7秒;p<0.01)、穿刺次数(1.39次对2.58次;p<0.01)和创伤性并发症发生率(1.9%对11.6%;p=0.015)方面均优于体表标志引导下置管。超声组感染性并发症的发生率与体表标志引导组无差异(2.9%对2.3%;p=0.589)。
超声引导技术在插入颈静脉透析导管时既安全又方便。它是建立临时性透析血管通路的一项有价值的技术