Zwissler B, Forst H, Messmer K
Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 1998 May 12;3(5):231-40.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the pattern of ventricular dynamic contraction and its relation to changes of transseptal pressure gradient during ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). For that purpose, left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pressures as well as ventricular shortening in septal-lateral (s.l.) direction were assessed in 8 dogs (RV n = 5) exposed to experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (eARDS) and PEEP 10 and 20 cmH2O (P10, P20). Despite maintenance of transmural central venous pressure by volume substitution, PEEP resulted in a fall of stroke index (P10 vs. eARDS: -7%, p<0.05; P20 vs. P10: -28%, p<0.05); this was accompanied by a fall of LV end-diastolic diameter (P10 vs. eARDS: -3.1%, p<0.01; P20 vs. P10: -7.4%, p<0.01). Although the transseptal LV to RV end- diastolic pressure gradient changed only minimally, there was a significant increase of paradoxic left ventricular systolic lengthening from 3.1% at eARDS to 4.5% at P10 (p<0.05 vs. eARDS) and 8.4% at P20 (p<0.05 vs. P10). Neither RV end-diastolic diameter nor s.l. shortening were significantly influenced by P10 or P20. It is concluded, that a rearrangement of LV dynamic contraction does occur during ventilation with PEEP, which is compatible with the concept of paradoxic systolic bulging of the interventricular septum towards the lumen of the right ventricle. Since this phenomenon occurred independent from changes of the end-diastolic pressure gradient between both ventricles, we suggest that systolic septal movement to the right is an active contractile process to support the function of a stressed RV.
本研究的目的是探讨在呼气末正压通气(PEEP)过程中,心室动态收缩模式及其与跨间隔压力梯度变化的关系。为此,在8只患有实验性急性呼吸窘迫综合征(eARDS)且接受10 cmH₂O和20 cmH₂O PEEP(P10、P20)的犬(右心室n = 5)中,评估了左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)压力以及室间隔-侧壁(s.l.)方向的心室缩短情况。尽管通过容量替代维持了跨壁中心静脉压,但PEEP导致每搏量指数下降(P10与eARDS相比:-7%,p<0.05;P20与P10相比:-28%,p<0.05);这伴随着左心室舒张末期直径下降(P10与eARDS相比:-3.1%,p<0.01;P20与P10相比:-7.4%,p<0.01)。虽然左心室至右心室舒张末期跨间隔压力梯度变化极小,但矛盾性左心室收缩期延长显著增加,从eARDS时的3.1%增至P10时的4.5%(与eARDS相比p<0.05)和P20时的8.4%(与P10相比p<0.05)。P10或P20对右心室舒张末期直径和s.l.缩短均无显著影响。得出的结论是,在PEEP通气过程中确实发生了左心室动态收缩的重新排列,这与室间隔向右心室腔矛盾性收缩期膨出的概念相符。由于这种现象的发生与两心室之间舒张末期压力梯度的变化无关,我们认为室间隔向右的收缩期运动是一种主动收缩过程,以支持功能受损的右心室。