Edwards A G, Rollnick S
Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Addiction. 1997 Dec;92(12):1699-704.
To identify the attrition rate of eligible subjects from the general practice brief intervention studies, reasons for attrition, and the potential bias arising from lost subjects.
Review of all published trials of brief intervention for excessive drinkers in primary care settings.
The attrition rate of eligible subjects from the general practice brief intervention studies ranges from 44.3 to 83.2% (mean 70.6%). The potential bias introduced by the characteristics of subjects available and not available for research is not adequately addressed. Where there is evidence, subjects unavailable for study or those lost to follow-up usually show different characteristics (e.g. younger, heavier drinkers, less educated) from those completing the study.
Study populations in general practice-based brief alcohol interventions may have been those most susceptible to intervention. This suggests caution is appropriate in generalizing from brief intervention study results to routine primary care.
确定基层医疗简短干预研究中符合条件的受试者的失访率、失访原因以及因受试者流失产生的潜在偏倚。
对基层医疗环境中针对过度饮酒者的简短干预的所有已发表试验进行综述。
基层医疗简短干预研究中符合条件的受试者的失访率在44.3%至83.2%之间(平均70.6%)。研究中可用和不可用受试者的特征所引入的潜在偏倚未得到充分解决。有证据表明,无法参与研究或失访的受试者通常与完成研究的受试者具有不同的特征(例如,更年轻、饮酒量更大、受教育程度更低)。
基于基层医疗的简短酒精干预的研究人群可能是最易受干预影响的人群。这表明在将简短干预研究结果推广到常规基层医疗时应谨慎。