Burge S K, Amodei N, Elkin B, Catala S, Andrew S R, Lane P A, Seale J P
Department of Family Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284, USA.
Addiction. 1997 Dec;92(12):1705-16.
This study examined the effects of two primary care interventions (a physician intervention and a clinic-based psychoeducational group) on drinking patterns, psychosocial problems and blood test results (MCV, GGT, SGOT and SGPT).
Subjects were randomized into one of four treatment groups: physician intervention, psychoeducation, both interventions, or no intervention. Follow-up data were collected at 12 and 18 months.
Subjects were recruited from a family practice outpatient clinic managed by a public hospital.
Included 175 Mexican-American female and male primary care patients who screened positive for alcohol abuse or dependence. These patients were not seeking help for alcohol problems.
Included a brief physician intervention and a 6-week patient psychoeducational group.
The Diagnostic Interview Schedule assessed subjects for alcohol abuse; the Addiction Severity Index measured alcohol-related problems, including psychosocial issues.
All four treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement over time, with few differences between intervention and control groups.
Assessment can be confounded with brief interventions; future investigators should use non-assessed control groups.
本研究考察了两种初级保健干预措施(医生干预和基于诊所的心理教育小组)对饮酒模式、心理社会问题及血液检测结果(平均红细胞体积、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、谷草转氨酶和谷丙转氨酶)的影响。
受试者被随机分为四个治疗组之一:医生干预组、心理教育组、两种干预措施都采用组或不干预组。在12个月和18个月时收集随访数据。
受试者从一家由公立医院管理的家庭医疗门诊招募。
包括175名筛查出酒精滥用或依赖呈阳性的墨西哥裔美国初级保健患者,这些患者未寻求酒精问题方面的帮助。
包括一次简短的医生干预和一个为期6周的患者心理教育小组。
采用诊断访谈表评估受试者的酒精滥用情况;成瘾严重程度指数测量与酒精相关的问题,包括心理社会问题。
随着时间推移,所有四个治疗组均有显著改善,干预组和对照组之间差异不大。
评估可能会与简短干预相混淆;未来的研究者应使用未接受评估的对照组。