Suppr超能文献

对墨西哥裔美国患者酒精滥用的两种初级保健干预措施的评估。

An evaluation of two primary care interventions for alcohol abuse among Mexican-American patients.

作者信息

Burge S K, Amodei N, Elkin B, Catala S, Andrew S R, Lane P A, Seale J P

机构信息

Department of Family Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 1997 Dec;92(12):1705-16.

PMID:9581003
Abstract

AIMS

This study examined the effects of two primary care interventions (a physician intervention and a clinic-based psychoeducational group) on drinking patterns, psychosocial problems and blood test results (MCV, GGT, SGOT and SGPT).

DESIGN

Subjects were randomized into one of four treatment groups: physician intervention, psychoeducation, both interventions, or no intervention. Follow-up data were collected at 12 and 18 months.

SETTING

Subjects were recruited from a family practice outpatient clinic managed by a public hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Included 175 Mexican-American female and male primary care patients who screened positive for alcohol abuse or dependence. These patients were not seeking help for alcohol problems.

INTERVENTIONS

Included a brief physician intervention and a 6-week patient psychoeducational group.

MEASUREMENTS

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule assessed subjects for alcohol abuse; the Addiction Severity Index measured alcohol-related problems, including psychosocial issues.

FINDINGS

All four treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement over time, with few differences between intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment can be confounded with brief interventions; future investigators should use non-assessed control groups.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了两种初级保健干预措施(医生干预和基于诊所的心理教育小组)对饮酒模式、心理社会问题及血液检测结果(平均红细胞体积、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、谷草转氨酶和谷丙转氨酶)的影响。

设计

受试者被随机分为四个治疗组之一:医生干预组、心理教育组、两种干预措施都采用组或不干预组。在12个月和18个月时收集随访数据。

地点

受试者从一家由公立医院管理的家庭医疗门诊招募。

参与者

包括175名筛查出酒精滥用或依赖呈阳性的墨西哥裔美国初级保健患者,这些患者未寻求酒精问题方面的帮助。

干预措施

包括一次简短的医生干预和一个为期6周的患者心理教育小组。

测量方法

采用诊断访谈表评估受试者的酒精滥用情况;成瘾严重程度指数测量与酒精相关的问题,包括心理社会问题。

研究结果

随着时间推移,所有四个治疗组均有显著改善,干预组和对照组之间差异不大。

结论

评估可能会与简短干预相混淆;未来的研究者应使用未接受评估的对照组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验