Suppr超能文献

通过多普勒超声测量对慢性肺血栓栓塞症和原发性肺动脉高压进行无创鉴别诊断。

Noninvasive differential diagnosis between chronic pulmonary thromboembolism and primary pulmonary hypertension by means of Doppler ultrasound measurement.

作者信息

Nakayama Y, Sugimachi M, Nakanishi N, Takaki H, Okano Y, Satoh T, Miyatake K, Sunagawa K

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 May;31(6):1367-71. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00107-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this investigation was to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism (CPTE) from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) by using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound techniques.

BACKGROUND

A recent investigation in our laboratory has indicated that the pulmonary artery (PA) pressure waveform conveys significant information that can be used to differentiate CPTE from PPH. Pulse pressure was markedly larger in CPTE than in PPH, indicating that the major occlusive site is central in CPTE and peripheral in PPH.

METHODS

In 19 patients with CPTE and 16 patients with PPH, we estimated PA systolic pressure and diastolic pressure from the velocities of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation, respectively.

RESULTS

Estimated systolic pressure was not significantly different between CPTE and PPH (mean [+/-SD] 81+/-20 and 79+/-21 mm Hg, respectively, p=NS). Pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure was higher in CPTE than in PPH (0.82+/-0.05 vs. 0.63+/-0.10, respectively, p < 0.01). Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure was also higher in CPTE than in PPH (1.65+/-0.30 vs. 0.94+/-0.25, respectively, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure separated CPTE from PPH, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00. Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure also separated them, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00.

CONCLUSIONS

Normalized pulse pressures estimated from Doppler ultrasound measurements enable us to noninvasively differentiate between CPTE and PPH.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是通过使用无创多普勒超声技术区分慢性肺血栓栓塞症(CPTE)和原发性肺动脉高压(PPH)。

背景

我们实验室最近的一项研究表明,肺动脉(PA)压力波形传达了重要信息,可用于区分CPTE和PPH。CPTE患者的脉压明显大于PPH患者,这表明CPTE的主要阻塞部位在中心,而PPH的主要阻塞部位在周边。

方法

对19例CPTE患者和16例PPH患者,我们分别根据三尖瓣反流和肺动脉反流的速度估算肺动脉收缩压和舒张压。

结果

CPTE和PPH患者的估算收缩压无显著差异(分别为平均[±标准差]81±20和79±21mmHg,p=无显著性差异)。CPTE患者经收缩压标准化的脉压高于PPH患者(分别为0.82±0.05和0.63±0.10,p<0.01)。经平均压标准化的脉压CPTE患者也高于PPH患者(分别为1.65±0.30和0.94±0.25,p<0.01)。受试者工作特征分析表明,经收缩压标准化的脉压可区分CPTE和PPH,敏感性为0.95,特异性为1.00。经平均压标准化的脉压也可区分二者,敏感性为0.95,特异性为1.00。

结论

通过多普勒超声测量估算的标准化脉压使我们能够无创地区分CPTE和PPH。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验