Nakayama Y, Sugimachi M, Nakanishi N, Takaki H, Okano Y, Satoh T, Miyatake K, Sunagawa K
Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 May;31(6):1367-71. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00107-7.
The purpose of this investigation was to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism (CPTE) from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) by using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound techniques.
A recent investigation in our laboratory has indicated that the pulmonary artery (PA) pressure waveform conveys significant information that can be used to differentiate CPTE from PPH. Pulse pressure was markedly larger in CPTE than in PPH, indicating that the major occlusive site is central in CPTE and peripheral in PPH.
In 19 patients with CPTE and 16 patients with PPH, we estimated PA systolic pressure and diastolic pressure from the velocities of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation, respectively.
Estimated systolic pressure was not significantly different between CPTE and PPH (mean [+/-SD] 81+/-20 and 79+/-21 mm Hg, respectively, p=NS). Pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure was higher in CPTE than in PPH (0.82+/-0.05 vs. 0.63+/-0.10, respectively, p < 0.01). Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure was also higher in CPTE than in PPH (1.65+/-0.30 vs. 0.94+/-0.25, respectively, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure separated CPTE from PPH, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00. Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure also separated them, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00.
Normalized pulse pressures estimated from Doppler ultrasound measurements enable us to noninvasively differentiate between CPTE and PPH.
本研究的目的是通过使用无创多普勒超声技术区分慢性肺血栓栓塞症(CPTE)和原发性肺动脉高压(PPH)。
我们实验室最近的一项研究表明,肺动脉(PA)压力波形传达了重要信息,可用于区分CPTE和PPH。CPTE患者的脉压明显大于PPH患者,这表明CPTE的主要阻塞部位在中心,而PPH的主要阻塞部位在周边。
对19例CPTE患者和16例PPH患者,我们分别根据三尖瓣反流和肺动脉反流的速度估算肺动脉收缩压和舒张压。
CPTE和PPH患者的估算收缩压无显著差异(分别为平均[±标准差]81±20和79±21mmHg,p=无显著性差异)。CPTE患者经收缩压标准化的脉压高于PPH患者(分别为0.82±0.05和0.63±0.10,p<0.01)。经平均压标准化的脉压CPTE患者也高于PPH患者(分别为1.65±0.30和0.94±0.25,p<0.01)。受试者工作特征分析表明,经收缩压标准化的脉压可区分CPTE和PPH,敏感性为0.95,特异性为1.00。经平均压标准化的脉压也可区分二者,敏感性为0.95,特异性为1.00。
通过多普勒超声测量估算的标准化脉压使我们能够无创地区分CPTE和PPH。