Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症病例中的“求死愿望”与“死亡权利”

["Wish to die" and "right to die" in a case of schizophrenia].

作者信息

Kumakura N

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Toho University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1998;100(2):113-22.

PMID:9584574
Abstract

Protection of life had long been the ultimate goal of medicine. Recently, patient's subjective judgement and self-determination also became another alternative principle. The situation is the same in psychiatry. Now, most patients with "wish to die" live in community, unless they show strong and urgent suicidal attempt. Meanwhile, "right to die" based on patient's self-determination has been established in the terminal state of cancer. Based on the same logical formulation, the "right to kill oneself" for patients with "intolerable psychological pain", is also asserted. Suicide as a right is now an impending agenda in psychiatry. A case of schizophrenia, who had killed her mother and who had "wish to die", was presented and discussed here. Conclusions were as follows: 1) "Wish to die" was psychologically interpreted as "denial of wish to live". At least, this meant that "wish to die" was unable to be a clear and convincing evidence that "real will" to die actually existed. 2) Nevertheless, the therapist who was overwhelmed by the patient's "wish to die", felt that it was a patient's real will to die. 3) "Wish to die" was not a self-determination to die, but rather a patient's inquiry into the quality of therapy, if the therapist was able to tolerate the wish. 4) If everyone is supposed to have privacy that none can ever intrude, this right should be the one only for limiting excessive intervention of medicine, but not for helping suicide. 5) How to verbalize patient's "wish to live" hidden deeply at the very core of "wish to die" and how to support the patient's "wish to live", had a crucial importance in clinical practice of suicidal patients for therapists to confront "wish to die" together with the patient. 6) In general, it was discussed that the concept of "right to die" in suicide and in terminal states, had to be constructed in some different way.

摘要

保护生命一直是医学的终极目标。近来,患者的主观判断和自我决定权也成为了另一项替代原则。精神病学领域的情况亦是如此。如今,大多数有“求死愿望”的患者生活在社区中,除非他们表现出强烈且急迫的自杀企图。与此同时,基于患者自我决定权的“死亡权”在癌症终末期已确立。基于同样的逻辑表述,“无法忍受心理痛苦”的患者的“自杀权”也被主张。自杀作为一种权利,如今已成为精神病学中亟待解决的议题。本文呈现并讨论了一例患有精神分裂症且杀害了自己母亲并有“求死愿望”的病例。结论如下:1)“求死愿望”在心理层面被解读为“对生的愿望的否定”。至少,这意味着“求死愿望”无法成为证明实际存在“真正的死亡意愿”的清晰且令人信服的证据。2)然而,被患者“求死愿望”压得喘不过气来的治疗师,会觉得这是患者真正的死亡意愿。3)“求死愿望”并非是对死亡的自我决定,而是患者对治疗质量的一种探寻,即治疗师是否能够容忍这种愿望。4)如果每个人都应拥有他人无法侵犯的隐私,那么这项权利应仅用于限制医学的过度干预,而非协助自杀。5)如何表达深藏于“求死愿望”核心深处的患者的“求生愿望”,以及如何支持患者的“求生愿望”,对于治疗自杀患者的治疗师在临床实践中与患者共同面对“求死愿望”而言至关重要。6)总体而言,人们讨论了自杀和终末期状态下“死亡权”的概念必须以某种不同的方式构建。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验